Id defintiely offer Grabow and Harden arb. Gregg, not so much. Why not offer to Gregg? He's more likely to get a multi-year deal and, thus, is also less likely to accept arbitration. He's also better than Grabow, so if he accepts arbitration the money would be better spent on Gregg than Grabow. I would offer to all three of them, for what it's worth. I would prefer to bring back only Harden, however. And Harden only if he came on a 1-2 year, incentive laden deal. If Gregg accepts arbitration, he's set to make a lot more than Grabow. Paying Gregg anything more than half a million to be a middle reliever/mop-up guy would be a complete waste. The likelihood of Gregg accepting, though, is quite low. He's a "proven closer" and, thus, is very likely to get a multi-year deal from someone seeking a proven closer. He's not considered a middle reliever/set-up guy like Cruz and others were who weren't signed because of their arbitration status. I could see Grabow accepting, I don't see Gregg accepting. Especially since he won't be a closer on the Cubs next year. But again, he might be overpaid, but getting a solid reliever for 1 year/$6-8 million isn't the worst thing in the world. Gregg sucks hot, smelly ass. Only an absolute moron of a GM would take the bait, and Jocketty, Sabean, Coletti, and Minaya already have "proven closers" on their respective rosters. Hendry needs to be very careful with this situation.