He's also running away with the team lead in losses. (he's only tied for the team lead in wins, not the leader) As for Maddux's losses on the year. 5/20 vs. CHW - 7.0 IP, 3 ER (Cubs scored 1) 7/16 vs. PIT - 8.0 IP, 2 ER (Cubs scored 0) 8/06 vs. NYM - 7.0 IP, 2 ER (Cubs scored 0) 8/27 vs. FLA - 9.0 IP, CG, 2 ER (Cubs scored 1) The other ones he probably deserved, but you can't fault the guy for no run support. He also should/could have many more wins if the Cubs would hit. 4/10 vs. MIL - 3 ER, ND 4/17 vs. PIT - 2 ER, ND 4/23 vs. PIT - 2 ER, ND 7/21 vs. CIN - 3 ER, ND 7/26 vs. SF - 2 ER, ND Should he have won all those games? Probably not, but he kept the Cubs in it, they just couldn't score for him. Yes, sure, but the same argument can be made for Prior and Zambrano: PRIOR 5/6 vs. PHI - 8 IP, 1 ER (ND) 5/11 vs. NYM - 7 IP, 2 ER (ND) 5/17 vs. PIT - 7 IP, 3 ER (ND) 7/29 vs. ARZ - 7.1 IP, 3 ER (ND) 8/9 vs. CIN - 7 IP, 3 ER (ND) 8/24 vs. ATL - 7.2 IP, 3 ER (Cubs scored 1) ZAMBRANO 5/3 vs. MIL - 7 IP, 3 ER (Cubs scored 1) 5/21 vs. CHW - 7 IP, 1 H, 0 ER (ND) 5/26 vs. COL - 7 IP, 3 ER (Cubs scored 1) 7/3 vs. WSH - 7 IP, 2 ER (ND) 7/22 vs. STL - 9 IP, 1 ER (ND) 7/27 vs. SF - 7.1 IP, 3 ER (ND) 8/22 vs. ATL - 8 IP, 2 ER (ND) So, you could argue that both these guys should have more wins, thus further adding to the fact that both are better than Maddux.