Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    68,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. I kind if ignored it and thought he was just indifferent. Was he really uncomfortable?
  2. Yeah, because of the schedule... well being mediocre and then also playing a rough schedule on top of it. On paper there isn't series you would say we should win in the month of April. You might be able to call a split with Arizona because we are at home, and their pitching is struggling big time. We might be lucky to get 10 wins. Pittsburg and Philthy are hardly juggernauts.
  3. By definition it always maintains consistency from park to park. I'm not sure how you could even think otherwise here. You not aware how motion tracking cameras work? It's not all on the framer, but that's a part of it. Well, the strike zone is not a fixed point in space, every ump calls it differently and every stadium has a unique setup for its system, so it would be a mistake to assume consistency. And they are referring to it as a framing measurement, which very clearly puts the blame on the catcher. Not to mention, they've played 2 teams in 2 stadiums so far and a small percentage of the league's umps have called their games.
  4. I get that it is pitch f/x data, but how reliable is that for determining the strike zone in every stadium? Each stadium is obviously uniquely designed which makes their systems at least questionable as to the accuracy of how it is measuring strikes. It is one thing to judge speed and movement of any one pitch, but the strike zone is fluid throughout the league, from ump to ump, batter to batter. There are a whole bunch of reasons why a pitch that any one stadium's system determines to be in the zone may be called a ball. The cameras track the trajectory of the ball, and it's accurate to within an inch. Since mounds, distances to the plate, and size of the plate are consistent from park to park, the data will be consistent across the board. Well, an inch is more than nothing. And by definition it cannot maintain consistency from park to park. And putting it on the framer is silly.
  5. Is there a reason they play the Browns every single year in the preseason? I feel like I've read something about it before, but can't remember. No idea.
  6. The stadiums have to have an influence since they set up cameras in each stadium to gather the data. I'm not suggesting a team employee is skewing the data.
  7. I get that it is pitch f/x data, but how reliable is that for determining the strike zone in every stadium? Each stadium is obviously uniquely designed which makes their systems at least questionable as to the accuracy of how it is measuring strikes. It is one thing to judge speed and movement of any one pitch, but the strike zone is fluid throughout the league, from ump to ump, batter to batter. There are a whole bunch of reasons why a pitch that any one stadium's system determines to be in the zone may be called a ball.
  8. Pitch f/x Which is sourced how?
  9. Why do you believe this? Blaming it all on framing is silly. But before you even get into the other reasons why a strike can be called a ball, how trustworthy is the data they are working with?
  10. Soon as you start actually reading the information and taking it for what it is. What is determining non-called strikes? How do they judge that? Does the system vary from stadium to stadium?
  11. 20% of their in-strike-zone calls have been balls. That's crazy. There's no way that's entirely about framing. Agreed. Part of that must be due to the wildness of Cubs pitchers. Guys like Veras and Strop won't be getting any favors from umpires. I'm thinking the built in respect for the Yankees and complete opposite for the Cubs is going to be in play.
  12. 20% of their in-strike-zone calls have been balls. That's crazy. There's no way that's entirely about framing.
  13. Agreed. Haven't the Blackhawks had some success against the bully teams in the playoffs? Boston, Philly, etc. They've lost when the opposing goalie gets hot or they are simply just the lesser team.
  14. Because media members are terrible at judging each others' work. Rick Reilly is routinely praised as some sort of genius, but only by other writers. These people are worse than ballplayers when it comes to the "if you have been around a long time you are awesome and deserve to stay around forever" mentality.
  15. Actually yeah, the point is they are safer. That doesn't necessarily make them better.
  16. viewtopic.php?f=3&t=61925&p=3051949#p3051949
  17. the Yankees closer went on the DL (no idea who he is), very big news for the Cubs next week.
  18. It'd be about perception. Fans that think the game is currently too long might reactively check out a shorter game. It's less subtle than other attempts, and thus more attention getting. any one inning will last just as long, if not longer. You won't get rid of the 25 man roster, and will still have a lot of relievers. The manager can come out in the 4th/5th and change relievers repeatedly for matchups, slowing everything down. Plus, it would be ridiculously low scoring.
  19. Here's the full Olney piece, although it's insider only... http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/buster-olney/post/_/id/5683?ex_cid=InsiderTwitter_Olney7innings I'm anything but a traditionalist, but no [expletive] way. I think it could go a long way to winning some more casual fans. At the same time, [expletive] them. I can't see how it would help gain fans. People who don't like the sport aren't going to start liking it if it ends at an arbitrarily earlier point in the contest.
  20. What does that even mean? Kreutz was a highly paid player who dominated the locker room. It sucked that the Bears "best" lineman was a freaking center, even when he was good. Garza is a fairly compensated mediocre lineman who is not guaranteed the starting job for game 1, let alone the entire season.
  21. He's a primadonna because he doesn't want to accept less money than he's worth? He's a primadonna because he thinks he worth more than he can get. Many not the right descriptor for him, but he seems to have an inflated sense of worth. I'm not saying I blame him. He thinks he's worth more than the Cubs are offering, not necessarily what he can get. I'm sure he could get what he wants on the open market. And since he already has "set for life" money there is no motivation to sign early. Plus, he plays for a terrible team that looks to remain terrible for a while, which is even less incentive to sign for anything shy of market value.
  22. Major Wright doesn't really want to be recognized signing his contract.
×
×
  • Create New...