Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    68,016
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. Not a chance in hell. He reached at full arms length above his head and yeah he missed it, but a shortstop should not make that high of a throw. It hit his glove and he didn't have to leave his feet. He needs to catch it. He would have had to leave his feet if he wanted to catch it, in which case the guy would have been safe and it would have been an error on Theriot. He probably thought it was going to keep coming down, since that's how Theriot's throws always move. In that case the worst case scenario is that Weeks is barely safe at first, with a chance of him still being out. Instead he ended up on second cause the throw got away. So it's an error on the throw for the guy reaching first and an error on Lee for him getting to 2nd. Regardless, that wasn't an error on Lee. He would have had to leave his feet to make the catch. He was fully extended and barely got a glove on it. It's not his error, it's an error on the throw and is always an error on the throw (unless the scorer is trying to preserve some errorless streak by the thrower)
  2. Not a chance in hell. He reached at full arms length above his head and yeah he missed it, but a shortstop should not make that high of a throw. It hit him in the glove he didnt have to jump or anything, thats on Lee. Definately wasnt a great throw, but its one Lee should catch. It tipped the top of the glove, uncatchable without a jump.
  3. Not a chance in hell. He reached at full arms length above his head and yeah he missed it, but a shortstop should not make that high of a throw. It hit his glove and he didn't have to leave his feet. He needs to catch it. He would have had to leave his feet if he wanted to catch it, in which case the guy would have been safe and it would have been an error on Theriot. He probably thought it was going to keep coming down, since that's how Theriot's throws always move.
  4. I think it's scorer's discretion, but unless it's absolutely positively without a doubt an attempt at a hit, they will reward a sacrifice.
  5. You know, he lollipops so many throws that I actually thought that was going to loop back down into Lee's glove even though it looked so high.
  6. http://www.accuweather.com/us/il/chicago/60601/forecast.asp?partner=accuweather&traveler=0&zipChg=1&metric=0 The weather for the Cubs home opener is going to be predictably mediocre.
  7. The timing of this game is enticing me to stick around the office longer than I have to today.
  8. I don't think it's a matter of him realizing he's not good at his job. I think he's fine at his job and knows that's always been good enough with Michael around. Now he's realizing that just doing enough disappoints the boss and he's getting caught with a lack of effort by the new guy. He realizes he doesn't try very hard and wants to make it look like he does.
  9. Anna is more of a catcher.
  10. http://deadspin.com/5207012/the-world-didnt-just-lose-nick-adenhart-yesterday The other victims.
  11. Please. You've never known anyone who sees everything through the prism of personal income? This country's full of them. It doesn't necessarily make him soulless, and I'm sure he felt some grief, but let's not pretend there was no calculation on his part. My first thought was it was Boras acting, but I really think it was genuine.
  12. I think there was a seperation, or maybe even a divorce filing, but they got back together.
  13. Anna Benson's husband still players baseball?
  14. I just turned on Texas/Detroit. This has to be quintessential "only reason I'm watching this game is because it's Good Friday, the markets are closed but I'm at work anyway and we have another day of the free preview extra innings package in the office" matchup.
  15. Not necessarily. If I have more than a couple drinks or feel impaired in the slightest bit, I call a cab. Basically I call a cab anytime I go out. But after using a sample breathalyzer, I am sure there have been many times where I unwittingly drove right around a .08-.10. Studies have been extremely inconclusive at best when it comes to that range. I mean 1 stronger than expected margarita with a Mexican meal and you're at that level. Most likely you do not feel much impairment. If you want to steepen drunk driving penalties for habitual offenders, I'm with you. If you want to steepen them on general principle, I want to know what you plan to do for people caught talking on cell phones, eating, texting, applying makeup, etc... The "I can handle it" defense is incredibly weak. Clearly you are an habitual offender. The fact that you haven't been caught doesn't change it. Quit being such a selfish bastard and stop driving when you drink.
  16. I heard that this morning on The Score and thought it was the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. What's Wise's OBP compared to Bradley's? Beyond that, it's just dumb to even try to compare the two players. It's a decent attempt to deflect criticism from their own guy.
  17. Truffle, did you watch last night's rangers/flyers game? What the heck happened on that first goal when they pushed the goalie into the net? I was there, and it looked to me that the ref lost sight of the puck, then took forever to do anything and finally decided he had to call it a goal when the goalie slid back.
  18. Good post. When the Bears were good on defense, up until 2006, they were bringing in fresh faces from the draft consistently. Granted they kept trying, but failed miserably with Bazuin and Okwo. Also, Anderson regressing has hurt. I think it's much easier to bring in veteran offensive players than defensive players. Defensive players can easily step in and play right away, getting by on their god given ability. They also lose effectiveness as the age moreso than offensive players. So, I would rather draft a DL or a CB and put him in the rotation over drafting a WR, QB, or even an OL and throwing him to the wolves. How is Hester counted on this list? He was drafted as a DB/KR, you can't count him as offense. That year they went DB, DB, DT, LB, DE, RB, G. Then, in 2007, they went Olsen 1, at the end of the draft, but your arbitrary value system gives more emphasis to that pick, even though he was closer in numerical order to DManning than Chris Williams. Aside from that, they wasted their next three picks on reaches that didn't come close to fulfilling their value, Bazuin, Wolfe, Okwo. The only guy still around is the offensive player, but I don't think you can say they emphasized offense over defense in that draft. I don't think they have ignored defense, as much as they got cocky with their supposed ability to find gems there. They ignored the offensive line, but they've picked defensive players. They've just done a horrible job recently. The last three drafts they went heavy defense, mixed, and heavy offense. The free agent/trade aspect is meaningless, as they've had much more stability of players on defense and invested more money than most teams have done on defense during that time. They just kept their own because earlier in this regime they actually did a good job finding guys. I also think a portion of the problem is that after the Super Bowl run, Lovie and the coaches got more decision making power, and they were able to get guys they wanted.
  19. You can't go a week with one catcher, especially one with no track record and a mangled hand. Good point, but my other option (sending Gathtight down and bringing up Johnson) should work. I'd rather be without Gathright for 10 days (the minimum length of a minor league assignment) that Soto for 15. I'd be fine with that, but doesn't he have to clear waivers?
  20. I wouldn't go that far, if only because of our country's stupid liquor laws, which practically forces those 18-21 to go off and hide when they drink, which contributes to them driving in dangerous situations. Also, if the death is that of another drunk driver, or a passenger that willingly got into a car with a drunk driver, I wouldn't want it to be a life sentence. But these people are such habitual repeat offenders, I do think it needs to be much harsher than it is now.
  21. Kind of off-topic . . . but does anyone else HATE the Tribs revised online section? (I know, old news, but with the start of the season, I've found myself pursuing around there more often in the last week or so) I really miss the dedicated ChicagoSports.com layout. At least I could find what I wanted, quickly. I don't really know how you cannot find what you want on their site quickly. I don't have a problem with it.
  22. You can't go a week with one catcher, especially one with no track record and a mangled hand.
  23. http://deadspin.com/5205745/man-who-caused-adenhart-crash-had-prior-arrest-record reports say he was drunk
  24. Masters starts on espn in 3, 2, 1...
×
×
  • Create New...