It does seem obvious, with the caveat that maybe he doesn't believe in Fields. If he doesn't, and has made that point relatively clear, does it make sense to have him around as the team essentially tanks 2022 to try and draft a QB in 2023? You're then restocking the team while taking another swing at the position and putting off the next reckoning until ~2026, in that QBs 4th year and presumably Daboll's lame duck season. If you have a coach that is cool on Fields but otherwise seems like the guy who checks your boxes, maybe it makes sense to go defense first, try and hire an OC that gets what you can out of Fields while turning the defense into a powerhouse. If Fields doesn't work out you have confidence the defense will be a strength and maybe you get a Grossman type career out of Fields, good enough to win with but not good enough to win on his own. Use up his 4 remaining control years while drafting QBs each year to replace him and luck into success while treating the QB position like RB. That type of guy presumably is where you'd go with a Flores, Eberflus or Bowles. Daboll makes a ton of sense. McCaskey has said he does not want to narrow the search to a specific type of coach, but I have a feeling what he wants is Lovie 2.0, who was the only guy to have sustained success in the modern era of Bears football. The one thing they have consistently done is go opposite of whatever didn't work last. Lovie's solid defense and inconsistent offense was replaced by a "modern offensive guy" who couldn't lead the team, which led to a defensive oriented solid and stable proven NFL guy. Fox's inability to improve the offense led to them going with a young offensive coordinator. It's going to take a lot for George to double down on young offensive coordinators, and go against his own type by moving to a "solid defensive guy" next.