Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    68,027

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. jersey cubs fan
    I'm hoping for somebody who has only been a minor league base coach since no earlier than 07.
  2. jersey cubs fan
    What a shame that will be.
  3. jersey cubs fan
    He's probably not as qualified as the person they wind up hiring will be.
  4. jersey cubs fan
    results not scientific
  5. jersey cubs fan
    I think the guys who will actually be on that staff would be a bit more important than the manager and pitching coach.
  6. jersey cubs fan
    plus the rugged handsomeness
  7. jersey cubs fan
    I think some of that is just paying lip service to the things fans and media demand, while also referring to a guy who will come into a game prepared with the pertinent information/data.
  8. jersey cubs fan
    It's not just the beer. It's the "players manager" style. There's less accountability in general assumed in that. Francona was/is considered a players manager. Not to mention that the anecdotal lax approach to conditioning taken by some of the Red Sox players this year was one of the many scapegoat excuses. Ultimately, the GM places that on the manager, whether right or wrong. I'm not taking a position for or against that idea, frankly, with a well assembled team, I'm pretty sure that most managerial candidates won't cost or gain many wins. Right. What I'm saying is that those kind of antics have been the scuttlebutt about the Red Sox for at least the entire time Francona was running the team, and they were even hyped up after they won the '04 WS. I can buy someone saying a lack of conditioning meant their pitching went flat at the end of the season, but that general climate/attitude/whatever was pervasive the entire time he was there and it didn't seem to be too much of a detriment. If this was Hendry, wouldn't we call this obvious reactionary BS, designed to imitate this years WS winner? I don't get it. If what was Hendry?
  9. jersey cubs fan
    He was on a 1 year deal with a mutual option. He retired, but as far as I know didn't decline the option. Huh?
  10. jersey cubs fan
    The whole "accountability" thing is much less important than the fact that Dusty liked bad decisions, poor players and overall stupidity. A lack of accountability is not why Dusty's teams failed. And you're absolutely right. Dusty was a terrible manager in just about every aspect. I'm just saying that you need a guy who can hold people accountable, because if a manager doesn't hold players accountable, eventually the players won't hold themselves accountable and then everyone will cease to give a crap. We saw it under Dusty, we saw it at the end with Lou. The GM holds people accountable by hiring, firing, trading, releasing and replacing. There is very little a manager can do to hold people accountable, and much like many fan complaints I think that is just an empty phrase.
  11. jersey cubs fan
    Very good point. If you hire a new guy with the intention of playing out the string for a year you run the risk of a really bad season and the fans turning on the new guy before he has a chance to manage a real team. Maybe they are smart enough to ignore fan dissent, but coming out of the Boston scene there's no doubt they are aware of the dangers of pissing off the masses.
  12. jersey cubs fan
    The whole "accountability" thing is much less important than the fact that Dusty liked bad decisions, poor players and overall stupidity. A lack of accountability is not why Dusty's teams failed.
  13. jersey cubs fan
    Sounds fishy to me that the framework of a deal would've been done before TLR retired. Not when he made that decision in August and I'm pretty sure everybody involved was aware of his intentions.
  14. jersey cubs fan
    My guess is he has a pretty good idea. Not sure he went so far as to line it up, because you run the risk of a credibility gap with regards to how they have handled the Quade thing.
  15. jersey cubs fan
    I think you are putting way too much stock in the Boston ownership's hitjob.
  16. jersey cubs fan
    No interest on my part. I doubt that's what it would take to land Pujols, although if it did, I would reconsider.
  17. jersey cubs fan
    We didn't let him go, he left. Well, technically he hasn't gone anywhere, but it seems pretty clear they expected him to void his option, and have prepared from the beginning to move past Ramirez.
  18. jersey cubs fan
    hadn't heard
  19. jersey cubs fan
    So far I love every decision made except for letting Ramirez go, and at least that is respectable, reasonable adn probably the right decision in the end. That's the complete opposite of every Cubs-related prior to Ricketts. It was always a bunch of completely bad decisions couple with the occasional one that was at least reasonable and respectable.
  20. jersey cubs fan
    newdirections sorry ryno
  21. jersey cubs fan
    So is there any chance we can get an edit on the thread title?
  22. jersey cubs fan
    Kyle, I really don't think you know what you are talking about when discussing WAR.
  23. jersey cubs fan
    I said that because as things stand now, they are bad. But a big part of that is because 1B is complete crap. And selling a player on winning is selling them on the notion that your presence might make the team the best in the league. You aren't selling them on the notion of maybe winning 87 games. Adding Pujols to a great team with 1B hole is an easy sell from the "we are going to win" standpoint. If you add Pujols you can easily put together an above .500 team in 2012, and start looking pretty damn good by 2013. You can say this team is 3-4 years away from really being a power, largely because there is no difference maker like Pujols on the team. But if you had Pujols on the team, and thus 1B settled and no need to keep patching that hole on a day-to-day basis, you can get started on building a great team a hell of a lot sooner.
  24. jersey cubs fan
    I see the logic behind it... If you can't put a team together quickly enough, you're essentially wasting a year or two of that huge salary and of the player's productive remaining years. I just think it's a gamble you have to take and that you can take when you can spend $130-140M on payroll. I don't buy that logic at all. The fact is you can put a team together to, at the very least, be in the race in 2012. That's worth something. You don't have to win the World Series in year one to justify a signing. It's a slam dunk situation for the Cubs with everything lining up in favor of signing those guys. You can win more than you lose in 2012 and be in position in year two to really put together a powerful team.
  25. jersey cubs fan
    The Cubs last year got replacement-level production out of RF, No. 4 starter and No. 5 starter. They also had several other starting pitchers exhibit quite a bit of poor luck. There's 8-12 wins to be had fairly easily by fixing each of those things. After that, it gets a bit harder to upgrade without signing a major upgrade, but there's still a lot of fairly easy wins to be cherrypicked. And all of your fixes are completely vague assumptions (plus hoping for luck).
×
×
  • Create New...