As annoying as things have been in the down times, the worse they have done in the Lovie/Jerry era has been 7-9. There's a hell of a lot of 4-12 type teams out there every year, and the Bears were never close to being that bad since Jerry was allowed to bring in his own coach. They averaged about 9 wins a year together, won three division titles, made two NFC Championship games and one Super Bowl. They would have easily won a playoff spot this year with a healthy Cutler. They stand up favorably to the Vikings and Lions during that time, same with the Cowboys, Redskins, Bucs, Cardinals, Falcons, Rams, Eagles, Seahawks, 49ers and Panthers. Really only the Giants, Saints and Packers have been better in the NFC during the era, and most of the AFC has been worse as well. They've done well. Not good enough of course, but there's a lot worse out there. This isn't Jim Hendry with resources that dwarf his competition in the division. I would be very concerned with who they wind up bringing in to replace him (if they do at all), especially considering the dark year of the Wanny/Jauron era that preceded Lovie/Jerry. About the talent level comment. I think this was easily the most talented team in the NFC in 2006. Lovie didn't get more out of them than what they were. He typically got as much as you could expect, but I don't think they ever outperformed reality.