Why did you believe your 4 innings were enough of a sample for criticism but not enough for a positive vote? For the record, I didn't vote since I didn't believe I had enough sample to make a good decision. Given the fact that the poll was created before there was a sample size I think that is besides the point. The point seems to be to gather a snapshot of how people feel on the matter at any given point. You realize that CC is the one that asked for justification by those with different opinions. Raisin just put CC's question back to him. I just see what raisin wrote, that there isn't enough sample.
i swear, it feels like it's been moved back like 3 times. for some reason , i thought it was this weekend. It won't be real to me until I walk by radio city Wednesday and see all the degenerates camping out overnight.
Apparently this guy dated a young Michael Irvin relative: I guess not bad depth. Better than trying to find some undrafted free agent to fill the spot. Hope he can contribute on special teams.
In completely random and worthless news, I was kind of surprised to hear Josh Lewin doing radio work for the Mets. They always seem to have about a half dozen people to choose from to do portions of their games. He's the quintessential modern completely boring and generic radio voice.
I will take the under. He moved it to Friday in hopes that there will be news of improvement of Hossa's health, therefore increasing his opportunity to have a reduced suspension. Shanahan is a moron and the league desperately wants the Coyotes to stay in Phoenix. Why is a hearing necessary? What can Torres or Tippet say in defense that won't completely be refuted by the visual evidence? Shanahan' looking for a reason to lessen the suspension. It's a player's right to have a hearing, I assume, bargaining into the CBA.
I hope Shanahan realizes the Hossa injury is on his shoulders. When he completely negated all of the tough talk on suspensions and safety with that ridiculous fine he made it very clear to all players that all bets are off and head hunting was back in season. You can't give the players that kind of clear signal and expect them to interpret it in any other way. A swift punishment with suspension right then and there and you cut back significantly on what came next.
I don't either, but they spent the better part of the 2000's doing just that. Hopefully all the talk is just talk and they actually will make an effort to improve the line through better talent, instead of just coaching. So far, Emery has done some nice things. He's not fixing everything at once, and probably not going "after it" as hard as many fans would want, but he made the Marshall trade and has grabbed some guys that can be decent pieces. But how he deals with the O-line in the draft is gonna tell me a lot about where this is heading moving forward. At this point I'd be much more excited to see him go after both sides of the line early and often than go after a WR. The WR need is real, but after the Marshall trade they can still get one in the middle rounds and try to develop. It's not like first round receivers are great bets or that late rounders/undrafted can't contribute.
I don't either, but they spent the better part of the 2000's doing just that. Hopefully all the talk is just talk and they actually will make an effort to improve the line through better talent, instead of just coaching.