Only a handful? I think there's a disconnect somewhere. We all see that running isn't as important in the NFL today. We all also agree that 2 RB systems are cheaper and just as productive (in most occassions) in the NFL. But I don't think NFL GMs have shown that they agree with us. The following teams will be paying a RB either over 7 Million (going by cap hit) this year or over 20 Million over the next 3-5 years. Minnesota, Tennessee, Seattle, Chicago, Baltimore, St Louis, Houston, Carolina, Jacksonville, San Francisco, and Atlanta. Oakland is just short as McFadden's cap hit is like 6.7Mil. Thats 12 of the 32 teams that have significant money tied into just 1 RB. That doesn't even include the teams that have drafted RB in the first round the last few years, that probably are hoping to sign their RBs to long-term contracts if they pan out as expected. 20m over 5 years is hardly a big number. And you didn't exactly list a who's who of smartly led football teams.