I hope they made the Colvin trade because they highly valued (and ultimately misjudged) Stewart rather than because they just decided they wanted to trade Colvin just because. Otherwise the Colvin trade would be a pretty good example of why that's not a sound philosophy, particularly when it's involving young and cheap palyers. That's ignoring the fact that Colvin was a 26 year old major leaguer, and we had a pretty firm idea what he is and what he isn't. Vitters is 22 years old and is improving his patience by the day. I'm willing to let Vitters hit his ceiling rather than decide it for him. It's not like this organization doesn't have the time to allow it. Yes, we need pitching. We also need someone to play 3B for the next few years until Baez is ready (assuming Baez is moved). I hope they made the trade because they thought there was value in Stewart and didn't have longterm hope in Colvin. Similarly, they could hold the same opinion of Vitters (all the talk of going after 3B, plus their insistence on quality defenders and the fact that they actually did acquire a 3B suggests they do have a relatively dim view of Vitters) and there is nothing wrong with putting him on a "we should trade this guy while he still has value" list. You just don't publish that sort of list.