Backloading is good. That is a little bit of an oversimplification. Backloading is not inherently good or bad. My personal preference would be to minimize backloaded contracts on a rebuilding team, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is a bad thing. Either way, it really should not be much of a factor here. Why wouldn't you prefer for a rebuilding team to invest the extra couple million in those rebuilding years to pay for (1) the higher backloaded years, and (2) other stuff with the extra money from the investment. Because in the short-term, with payroll plummeting and no apparent intentions of signing guys now, you can pay guys a little more now, thus leaving more room at the back end when you do want to sign guys. Plus, "other stuff" isn't really a thing. That being said, this contract hardly looks backloaded at all. The climb is very gradual.