Jump to content
North Side Baseball

imb

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    31,163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by imb

  1. what do you call not trying to sign good baseball players because it doesn't matter if you win or lose genius. look, at the end of the day im horsefeathers around for laughs and im still right and you're trying too hard
  2. we're all saying the same thing, you just don't realize it because you're too busy cosplaying your objection your honor lawyer horsefeathers on nsbb outside of the few and the proud, no one wants to win because you can make easier money not trying. some teams are Capital T trying because their org is in better shape thanks to smart FOs or sexy coastal locations that can lure big names. the cubs would have gladly paid ohtani $500m or whatever, not because they would win with him but because they'd turn that $500m into a bil. When he poofed they said nevermind. It's not like they were in win-now mode when they were chasing him, he would have been good for the bottom line. we're talking about why no one is signing these FAs. no ones signing them because it literally doesn't matter whether you win 78 games or 86 games, and there's no difference between winning 68 games and 78 games. go back and find the part where i said no one wants to compete with the dodgers and yankees payroll, counselor. i said no one wants to bother spending $20m for marginal improvements when all the stars will only go to 2 or 3 locations. what's the point when the money flows regardless
  3. no kidding, its almost like 27 teams see 3 teams with a huge revenue advantage and are saying whats the point. great point man
  4. "as i said endlessly" ok dan patrick keep us updated
  5. shut the horsefeathers up rob
  6. lol baseball is so cooked. everyone sees what the dodgers and the yankees are doing and have just given up
  7. he's probably a $25m a year guy or something like that but the cubs shouldn't even bother if they're not going to be a serious franchise otherwise. either try to be good for real or don't waste my time.
  8. new amber alert just dropped
  9. they never pulled them out
  10. It's almost the weekend so im being optimistic the reason the dodgers are the Dodgers is because Big market/access to more money Farm that consistently produces very good players, giving them financial flexibility They use that flexibility to target specific stars in trades (then extend them) or FA. This keeps their payroll and LT number manageable The Cubs currently Are in a big market with access to more money A farm that never produces horsefeathers (outside of the magical 2016 run) Not the same level of financial flexibility because we're overpaying for midtier guys like taillon because we are not developing good depth Hence, our payroll is more susceptible to getting fucked up through FA because we can't yet supplement the roster with cheap depth Out of all the big acquistions this year, 2 (ohtani, yamamato) clearly do not have any interest in the cubs, and Soto required something of an overpay in prospects (which i would be willing to do, but i imagine the cubs weren't because...) They want Counsell's first year to be about integrating prospects to see if he can get more out of the MLB readyish guys, banking on development from the prospect tier that's still a year or two away, and figuring out how far away they truly are. My guess is they don't spend until the farm is producing guys, and then they go and try to make one or two big splashes in FA to push the team over the top. If you look back to the only success the franchise has ever had, it came when they were producing stars (Rizzo, KB, Javy) and depth guys like Soler or whatever. Once those guys were cooking at the MLB level, they spent on Heyward (Jed's lament) Lester and Zobrist then filled it in with trade deadline acquistions to fill holes. By Monday i'll be in a bad mood again and be much less forgiving but for 72 hours this is how i feel
  11. yeah right, he'll probably play for free lol
  12. PCA cant hit, this team cannot go into the season relying on him if it truly wants to compete
  13. is there even a hint of evidence that he's wrong or are we just moving into the bargaining phase of offseason grief?
  14. the dodgers won 90 games 5 times between 2013 and 2019 and more than 100 games once during that span. They weren't dipping into the top bin of free agency because they didn't need to, something you can't say about any iteration of the cubs since theo left. the rest is just nonsense
  15. i mean on day one we said, this means one of two things - either they're going to spend and they want a good manager to guide a championship caliber team, or they're looking for cheap wins to maintain the status quo. One of those two seems more likely right now and it's not the first one.
  16. you can basically boil this down to a spreadsheet. They know how much investment yields however much return. This isn't about winning, they did that once. Now they want to sit back and make money. They're never going to spend $300m on a player because they can make a profit without doing it. That's the end of the story. The entire plan is to stay middle of the pack so the fans don't completely disappear, tease them with moderate improvements, and then hope they get lucky with prospects again and can win without spending. It's just how it is.
  17. ahh, the sounds of these sweet summer children getting surprised at the cubs doing nothing in the offseason
  18. now go find me opinions on austin meadows
  19. he did always have his finger on the pulse of nsbb
  20. god damn i miss fred
  21. im sorry, i didn't realize quoting fangraphs stats you dont understand counts as "analysis. " I have this weird theory where its good to have good players and it's bad to have bad players. austin horsefeathers meadows. shut the hell up
  22. i can cuss, it was grandfathered in as part of the purchase of the site
  23. the part where you don't wanna spend $25m/per on a 27 year old gold glove, MVP, all-star who can play 1B/CF/RF (all needs) while also hitting for power, average and a below-league average strikeout rate while simultaneously arguing that we should compete with no one to sign austin meadows, he of the neg-1 war in 30 games over 2 years for detroit, who doesn't even play baseball anymore because of mental health issues. that part, dumbass.
  24. who cares as long as they're still in the austin meadows sweepstakes
  25. you could just stop posting stupid horsefeathers and save me the flight
×
×
  • Create New...