I don't disagree. However, my question is this: if we need a lefty replacement for the pen, why not bring up Rohlicek (sp?)? A. He has spent the entire year in relief. B. I'm pretty sure he has slightly better numbers. C. We have seen Koronka at the ML level, but not Rohlicek. D. Rohlicek, like Koronka, is on the 40 man. Is there a service time detriment to bringing up Rohlicek that is truly prohibitive? If we needed a pen lefty because management believes we are still in it, then Bartosh would have been the best choice due to his experience and numbers. The decision, while not having a major impact, is indicative of the curious thought processing that is going on with management. Thats what is the most difficult for me to swallow.