No, that's exactly the point. You said that was a possible argument, and I showed that it is a ridiculous argument. There is no manipulation in showing that Cedeno's minor league career was immensely more impressive than Fontenot's. You've done nothing to show that there are logical arguments for the things I listed. How about this: However much Cedeno's minor league numbers show he's a better prospect, Fontenot's minor and major league numbers show that he's more likely to produce this year, which is why he was projected to have better stats than Cedeno by most of the projection systems. As others have mentioned, PECOTA leads the way in that, but is joined by Bill James, Tango, and ZIPS. Add to that Fontenot has been rather unlucky with his balls put into play so far (a 27.7% LD percentage translating into a .304 BABIP) and Cedeno has been rather lucky (a 19.6% LD percentage, and he has a .400 BABIP) and that their difference in their stats is only 2-3 bloops falling for Fontenot or a couple ones caught for Cedeno. Plus if you're arguing over the last couple of weeks, you also have to add in that Fontenot is red hot while Cedeno is scuffling. I believe they are similar options hitting wise now over the course of the season thanks to Cedeno's improved approach (with Cedeno being the better overall player due to his capable defense at short) but if you're going to play one at second as part of a double switch, going with the hot hand or the left/right matchups is the way to go. Right now, that's been Fontenot quite a bit, and he probably has matched Cedeno so far this season in hitting the ball. It's just that a few more of Cedeno's have fallen in. There...that's reasonable. I still think Cedeno is a much better option, but what you said didn't make me cringe.