I agree that it doesn't make sense to do so. But I also don't like the idea of including three "top" prospects for the likes of Matt Garza. For me, it really comes down to which prospects are being discussed. It sounds like Chirinos is included, which is fine. Like a few others have mentioned, I'm hoping that they might consider Lake a top shortstop prospect. I'd also prefer to deal Jay Jackson than McNutt or Archer in a deal like this, although it sounds like Archer is off limits anyway (thankfully). Why are people so in love with Wells? Is it just for cheap decent production? I would not give up Jackson, McNutt, or Archer for Garza. With the direction this team is headed there is no reason to trade any of them.