Well, sure they could have. But I'm fairly certain the Cubs aren't in the market for infielders. Kinda wish they were for one that good. It's not like Bryant has to stick at 3B. Yeah, Donaldson would definitely have been appealing, but if we're going to make trades, I'd just as soon see them use our trade chips on a quality OF, SP or C before an infielder. And I don't think that Bryant is going to stick at 3B, but Baez may end up there, or even Castro. It's just not a position of need in any way. It's not a situation like Heyward where I am thinking "damn, we really missed an opportunity there". I am; I'll take an established young player like Donaldson over a prospect any day. Especially since someone like Baez almost certainly would have been in the deal, so to act like the Cubs are likely facing some kind of overflow of starting infielders in the wake of a Donaldson trade is faulty.