Agreed. San Diego has similar problems with the Bears in that their passing game is way better than their running game. Obviously, San Diego is a better team, but the point is that late in games, Rivers will try to make a big play on 1st down when the opposing team figures they will run the ball to run some clock. They know the running game is bad when the defense doesn't know they are running the ball, so what would be the point of running it when they basically assume you are running it. Time and again, Rivers exposes the defense with those types of plays. In fairness, the final touchdown pass in overtime is exactly what I'm referring to. They were almost in field goal range to begin with, and the defense was probably counting on another running play or a short 1st down type of pass, which allowed for DA to have a one on one opportunity. The one thing about Turner's playbook has always been its transparency. There just aren't enough smart gambles in there. San Diego goes for the big play on all downs from all points on the field at nearly every situation in the game. It's quite effective too. They also have gigantic receivers and a great deep ball throwing QB.