As you say it isnt wise, but game scouting hitters (coaching) has been what I have done for the last 9 years. (I believe did very well) One of the things about the internet you can say what ever bovine fertilizer you like, but its what I have done. No offense taken because I know none was offered. As far as the Cubs organisation fixing his swing. Look at the long and sucessful track record they have posted the last 5 or 6 years with position players. Add to that the human sturboness we all possess, meaning until he sees a need to adjust he wont despite what the Cubs want him to do. Every time I have sat down with another coach, (HS, College, Pro), they all get back to that point. Until the hitter is ready to adjust or you can point to others who have made adjustments and gone on to success making the player believe in you. You are wasting your time trying to change them. Patterson, Hill, Meyers, Murton, anyone? IMO Patterson never bought fully into what the Cubs wanted of him, and maybe the Cubs never really settled on what they wanted of him. Hill and Meyers were good average guys who came in and were told that they had to pull the ball. Instead of utilizing strengths, they were pushed to do things they really didnt need to do. Murton is an example of that also. Does anyone notice the connection with Murtons struggles and his being pushed to be more agressive? Dont get me wrong, I want Colvin to be a guy who plays for 20 years and is part of a Cubs team that wins 15 World Series in that time. But I just dont have faith in the player development side of the house to make that happen.