Westbrook and Lilly please I'd much rather Cotts start than Meche. But give me Westbrook. somehow i think a guy who has pitched a total of 179 innings in 3 years might have a problem as a starter. He's not going to give you 33 starts and 220 innings, but you can convert a reliever to a starter in 1 season. If he's a 6th starter/swingman guy, then you could get 12-15 starts and 100 innings without stretching him too much. i would agree that it's possible but why bother? he will most likely be a 5 inning pitcher at best for a while and with other options like meche, iwaga & lilly who are already used to pitching 180+ innings, i highly doubt that cotts would be that much better as a starter than those other guys to justify taking him out of the bullpen. Having someone capable of putting up 5 solid innings is a much better alternative that what happened in 2006 when a bunch of kids who were not ready for MLB were thrown into the mix. Angel Guzman >>>> Neal Cotts, but I would have rather had Neal Cotts making the starts Angel made last season so he could continue developing. After watching them last season, it's also pretty clear that most of them will not be ready in 2007 either so why not add someone who gives you another starting option?