Jump to content
Check out our 2026 MLB Draft tracker, with player scouting reports, signing pool money, and much more! ×
North Side Baseball

mul21

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,107

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by mul21

  1. mul21
    it may have more to do with playing San Diego 4 times(2-2) and the Mets(2-0). Prior that 17 games they had just gone 1-5 vs STL/ATL. This is a team with good pitching and very,very streaky players. When we lose we will keep it close, when our offense rolls, we win by a lot, but that simply doesn't happen often enough. We have Rizzo and Valbuena above .800 ops, and then Castro is above .700 and no other regulars above .700- That's just not a potential .500 team. Something something run environment.
  2. mul21
    awwwwww [expletive] no I was thinking that was the guy from App St. and you certainly confirmed it for me.
  3. mul21
    That whole admitting to being addicted to pot probably deflates the value a bit.
  4. mul21
    I may be way off base but this made my heart sink a little, because I was hoping for at least one guy who could start or play in the OF or C next season. This makes me re-rethink when they plan on being competitive. Am I wrong? I don't see why getting a pick would be any different than getting a high ceiling, high risk minor leaguer as part of a deal, they just have more control over who that guy is. I don't see it as having any relevance to when they're going to be competitive one way or the other.
  5. mul21
    The download has nothing to do with it because it wasn't coming from EA, but yeah, the fact that the Duke PG just happened to have the same skillset as their PG that year along with his physical features, uhhh yeah, you're selling that guy's image. And to Derwood, the guys on those covers were always guys who were done with their NCAA eligibility one way or another. Oh yeah, I know, it was just another point in their favor that the guys on the game actually matched the guys on the teams.
  6. mul21
    I'm getting to the point where I lean that direction too. As much as you don't draft for need, it sure would be nice to have an actual catching prospect in the system.
  7. mul21
    They are, the Hawks just can't stay on their feet to get off a clean shot on what seems like the last half dozen they've had.
  8. mul21
    Bickell too. He's been pretty invisible since the Blues series.
  9. mul21
    Seems like LA is getting a lot of hands to the Hawks faces. Haven't noticed as much of that before tonight.
  10. mul21
    Who let this guy back into Other Sports?
  11. mul21
    Season back on!
  12. mul21
    the league doesn't want to see the Hawks win another cup. That makes zero sense. They're getting unheard of ratings with the Hawks in it.
  13. mul21
    Does the puck or just the stick have to be above the bar? If it's the puck, it's the right call.
  14. mul21
    That was my first reaction.
  15. mul21
    It would be nice for this to be a nice, stress free 5 or 6-0 game.
  16. mul21
    How can they win that? EA purposely didn't use any real names in their NCAA titles, and the "likenesses" are generally generic cartoon people. Maybe the handful of players who were on the covers of the games might get something, but Mr. Left Guard On Louisiana-Lafayette deserves nothing Well, when height, weight, ethnicity and number all match the guy who played that position for that team in that year, it becomes patently obvious what they did. Combined with the fact that you could go out and buy a download to populate all the names to what they actually were and they have a great case.
  17. mul21
    Did Valbuena kick Ricky's dog?
  18. mul21
    Too many unknowns right now for me to have a real solid opinion. Depends a ton on who is in the mix for the return (which I have little doubt they'll get good value) but even moreso on who's available on his type of deal this offseason. I'd be fine with giving him 2 more years at a similar rate to what he's getting this year if the other options for next year aren't appealing.
  19. mul21
    Oh, I'm completely on board with disliking him. His scoring is getting a bit annoying.
  20. mul21
    My biggest concern with him is that he's only averaged 6 IP/start once in his career. And I'd much rather give him 2/$8-10 per than a QO. I don't think he'd get signed until after the deadline if they did that if he turned it down and it's a pretty unnecessary overpay if he doesn't.
  21. mul21
    I just thought the disrespected thing was funny and Rizzo didn't play yesterday.
  22. mul21
    Here's the first one. http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/52448062/v33330777/chcmil-rizzo-lifts-a-tworun-homer-to-rightcenter And there's #2. Great call by JD too. http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/52448062/v33333083/chcmil-rizzo-lifts-his-second-tworun-homer
  23. mul21
    Yeah, to me. I'm tired of watching them get shut out every other day. But in the grand scheme of things, no, probably not really.
  24. mul21
    There has to be somebody out there on the scrap heap better than what they're throwing out there every day. I'm tired of seeing Nate and his non existent OBP all the time.
  25. mul21
    And that one was more impressive.
×
×
  • Create New...