as demonstrated by a career winning % of .517 (even after managing Tampa)? It's all about the team you have, not so much about the coach. The rare cases are like Baker who's still stuck in the '60s in regards to walks, and Lou doesn't seem to be any improvement. I mean, Baker had a pretty winning percentage too. He doesn't even know what WHIP is for Christ's sake. I'm not saying he might not be successful, if we field a good team, there's a chance he will be, like in Seattle. But I think just about anyone else would have been better.