I didn't think it was obvious, but I could see that being the case. I'm not a Soriano hater or anything...the comment just kinda rubbed me the wrong way. I'll get over it fast if he keeps hitting like he has so far. I'm not sure the .667 SLG is sustainable, but everything else to this point probably is.
I have a feeling that the weather forecast also affected the attendance yesterday, since it was supposed to be cold, windy and rainy yesterday. Wouldn't be surprised to see a bigger crowd today.
Thank goodness for a reasonable explanation. I still don't think it would have been a terrible move (probably because I feel Reed Johnson might have a little more in the tank than he might actually have) but it would be incredibly unconventional. And part of that reason is that there are a thousand variables to consider in that situation (time/score, splits of both batters, splits of pitcher, defensive change, burning a bench player, possibility of extra innings). It's one of those decisions that is really hard to determine and so going with convention and not making waves is usually called for. Hopefully Pena won't be out more than a day or two at most because while the starting lineup may not suffer that much the bench will be stretched incredibly thin without him. I just don't think it reflects well on the staff's perception of Pena if he's lifted in game 4 based on performance matchups.
Going to the game tomorrow, and can't say I'll have high hopes with Wood and Marmol unavailable, and Pena with an injury. Maybe Cashner will just toss a no-no and everyone can have some rest.
Maybe I'm overly conservative, but I don't want my kid anywhere near playing full-contact football or hockey in high school, or boxing, well, ever. Plenty of other sports to go around that aren't nearly as high-risk for brain injuries.
3-4 insurance runs would be nice, actually. Something that will be enough to have the coaching staff think "Hey, I bet Russell could probably finish this one out."
If by giving up 5 baserunners in 2 games is a beast, then, yeah, he's a beast. They better win this one because Marmol and Wood will be unavailable tomorrow. Probably Marshall too if Quade wants any of them to last past Memorial Day. Samardzija for closer tomorrow! Context is fun, aka I'm sure the errors were his fault, and he needs to more efficiently intentionally walk a batter.
Yep, passed Westbrook, Gasol, Nowitzki and Durant in PER last night to jump to 7th. 6th is Kobe, 5th is CP3. He won't get into the top 3 (James, Howard, Wade), but 4th is feasible if he doesn't have any clunkers in the last 6.
I'm torn on this. Obviously having home court over the Spurs if they met in the WCF would be great and if there's a first-round upset, the Lakers would get that team instead of the Spurs/Thunder/Mavs in the second round. But if the favorites all win, I'd much rather play Dallas than OKC in the second round and Dallas and OKC are pretty much locked into the 3 and 4 seeds barring an epic collapse by Dallas. Hopefully the Bulls can lose a game or two so the Lakers would have home court in the Finals if the two teams met. There's no reseeding in the NBA playoffs. So, the 1 seed in the West will get OKC/Denver in the second round.