Overbay was around replacement level last year, I suppose that's his new level of ability? Of course we go by the standard rule veteran has bad year, DOOOOOOOM, guy under 27, breakout potential. Is this the part where you create a thin strawman so you can argue with yourself for a page? Lyle Overbay is 35, was below replacement level last year and most of it was hitting. He doesn't hit for power and doesn't field the position adequately anymore. He's not even a short-term option. He's a worse option than Jeff Baker. So Overbay fell off a cliff last year at the age of 34. Luckily Carlos Pena will only be 34 next year. Again, because every 34 year old is identical. Because Lyle Overbay has been a bad fielder for several years, it means Carlos Pena will magically become that at age 34. And since Lyle Overbay can't hit for any power, Carlos Pena will suddenly be rendered unable to hit home runs. It's a stupid comparison, because they're completely different players at this stage of their careers. Neither is a long term option. At least Pena has short term value in his power and fielding.