Busch Stadium has undoubtedly had a great run, but when you think of pantheon ball parks, Wrigley is at the top of the list with Fenway, Yankee Stadium, Ebbets Field, etc. Busch has a lot of great baseball memories, proud tradition, and I personally grew up there, but let's be honest. It has neither the charm or character of Wrigley Field. Wrigley is in the middle of a residential neighborhood. There are bars, restaurants, stores, and houses surrounding it. It has that real sense of community that no other baseball stadium has. Up until the mid 90's, Busch was essentially a football stadium. Adding real grass, the big scoreboard, and new seats helped a lot, but it was still a cookie cutter that looked like a gigantic ash tray. My statement was in no way a rip at Busch, but to say that it is as historically significant as Wrigley Field is preposterous. Some of you are equating success to history. I would argue that Wrigley Field is more significant because of the Cubs lack of success. What other reason did 30,000 + people have to go watch a game in 98 degree August afternoons when their team was 20 games out of 1st? Wrigley.