I'll play devil's advocate for Hendry, though. Maddux for Izturis Consensus was that Maddux was pretty much done as a solid starter. No one on this board wanted to him back the next year, especially not at the price he would have wanted. The Cubs weren't going anywhere. Hendry took a chance on a gold-glove SS whose potential indicated his hitting would pick up. EDITED TO ADD: Many believed Maddux and Hendry had a handshake agreement to give him to a contender if the cubs were tanking. Barrett for Bowen If clubhouse distraction were ever a legit. cause to trade a player, this was it. Mulitple flare-ups would have been one thing were they isolated. But Barrett, a catcher past the age of productive catcher years, was having a bad year offensively and an abysmal year behind the plate. Bowen was cheap, young, had a decent OBP, and virtually guarenteed better defense. Like Maddux, Barrett was not coming back the next year. A certain (if negligible) amount of budget room was freed up with this trade as well, allowing flexibility of deadline/August moves. Pierre for Prospects no devil's advocacy here :( I guess we . . . needed a "lead-off hitter"[/b]