No, but some are significantly downplaying his value. He's no Tim Duncan, but he provides more overall value than say, Ilgauskas. I'd say that's highly debatable. I'm not surprised. It's a loaded question anyway considering who you used, if I disagree with you I come off as a homer. Replace Z with Kaman, Gasol, or Diaw and the point remains. Wallace is awful at the offensive end, is the contract he got worth it for someone who is such a liability for half the time on the floor? You think Chris Kaman provides more overall value than Ben Wallace? If that doesn't prove my point that you're significantly undervaluing Ben, I don't know what will. Seriously.