I don't believe this has been discussed yet but the terms of the bonuses were mentioned in the AP article. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3128280 If he finishes 55 games, I am willing to bet that he has performed at a level higher than Dempster did this past season. That's a fairly large incentive, and I'm hoping the Cubs only allow him to realize it if he is significantly better than mediocre. Dempster finished 58 games last year and 64 the year before. Yes, but would the Cubs have kept Dempster in that role if there were incentives in his contract that were similiar to incentives allowed in Woody's new contract? Per Cot's, Dempster can reach much smaller incentives (total of 2.5 million over 3 years), but they are based upon performance, winning a Cy Young Award, and winning the Rolaid's relief reward....not games finished. Are the Cubs going to allow Wood to close games all season if he's a mediocre closer?