I didn't come to this thread to preach. And yes, I did read your rant. How is that "slander"? Its only slander if it is not true, and in Mr. Greenstein's case, there would likely need to recklessness or malicious intent b/c he is a public figure. How do you know its not true? You don't. You are thus speculating. And I don't think she is insinuating a thing. Rather, she was simply responding to someone's comment about Mr. Greenstein. Yeah, so what? That somehow makes her a less valuable source? Does Hoops want his identity to be known? He clearly has some pretty good connections whose identities could be compromised if he reveals himself. Couldn't Hoops himself be the source, and he is using the "my sources tell me" stuff to protect himself? All evidence to the contrary. You are evidently pretty hot under the collar. Except people who wish to remain anonymous but claim to have inside info. Rather then railing against her, why don't you just take her posts with a grain of salt?