Not really. If left up to the individual bowls, you'd probably get a good matchup instead of one-sided snoozers like Oklahoma/Connecticut. I'm not saying this is the perfect system-- far from it. I'm just saying it's better than what's in place now and could lead to better viewing as a fan. No, it would not be better. For example, this year Stanford would wind up in the Holiday bowl or some such nonsense because the Fiesta Bowl and Orange Bowl want to set up Georgia v. Nebraska or Michigan v. Texas, because those fans will buy more tickets. The Bowls need less power, or none if we can help it, not more. True. I could see that happening. No changes will happen til 2013 though, and these proposed changes don't have any teeth yet-- it's pretty much just thinking out loud. And the BCS folks are stubbornly resistant to change, so these changes probably have less than a 50% chance of happening anyway.