Jump to content
North Side Baseball

erik316wttn

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    16,161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by erik316wttn

  1. It would have to be an American-made machine.
  2. I didn't hate him as a person, but I hated him as a GM. If he gets a job within the organization that is far away from assembling talent, I'd be ok with it. Wait, how does somebody think Hendry is a good guy to be the face of the Cubs but not want him building the team? You think he should be some sort of figurehead? You can't be the face if you don't have any power, and if you are a GM type who isn't building the team in the future you have no power and can't be the face. What the heck does that phrase even mean? I thought Jim Hendry as the face of the Cubs epitomized everything that held back this organization during a decade when it could have and should have dominated its division. Hendry is a decent person and executive who wasn't interested in screwing people over and all that. But he couldn't do his job and be competitive against the other more modern executives in the league, let alone the more traditional ones who just got better results than he did. Perhaps some sort of PR capacity or something if he wanted it. Probably not, but if they gave him that sort of position I wouldn't hate it.
  3. Good news for a former Cubs radio alum. I wish him well. http://www.startribune.com/sports/twins/133155768.html
  4. EXPOS YES What was that old expos logo supposed to be, anyway?
  5. I didn't hate him as a person, but I hated him as a GM. If he gets a job within the organization that is far away from assembling talent, I'd be ok with it.
  6. Please win in San Diego, Packers. Thanks.
  7. Only the really good ones. ....oh, you weren't talking to me. Heh.
  8. Valentine seems pretty outspoken. I'd rather have a first-time manager who will buy into Hoyer and Epstein's philosophy and do what he's told. Preferably someone from a sucessful organization. I don't know what Bobby V's managing philosophy is, or what stats he values, but I'm sure he wouldn't be hired if his past actions don't fit into the organizational philosophy Theo and Hoyer put in place.
  9. Does Bobby V even have aspirations to leave his cushy TV job for the stress of managing again?
  10. I wouldn't mind at all. If they want to give Sandberg an interview over Tito, go for it. Sandberg could be wearing uniform of the Hitlerburg Kidtouchers for all I care so long as he's not managing the Cubs. You don't even want to know what their sign for "bunt" is.
  11. The whole "accountability" thing is much less important than the fact that Dusty liked bad decisions, poor players and overall stupidity. A lack of accountability is not why Dusty's teams failed. And you're absolutely right. Dusty was a terrible manager in just about every aspect. I'm just saying that you need a guy who can hold people accountable, because if a manager doesn't hold players accountable, eventually the players won't hold themselves accountable and then everyone will cease to give a crap. We saw it under Dusty, we saw it at the end with Lou.
  12. I don't mind "Player's Managers" to a point-- but Dusty was a Player's Manager and never held anyone accountable for poor play. That's taking it to far. It's fine if you want someone the boys in the clubhouse can like, but you also need someone they aren't going to walk all over, either.
  13. I'm disappointed he won't be coming back, but I trust Theo knows what he's doing. If we don't get Pujols or Fielder though (and Aram walking hurts our chances, I think) this offense is going to suck hard next year.
  14. I like Dr. Cub's idea and would be able to live with a video screen on top of the old scoreboard. Ideally I'd just like the old scoreboard to be able to show the scores from all the MLB games, not just select ones.
  15. Good riddance. :yahoo: :yahoo: Have fun drinking yourself into oblivion, jackass.
  16. There's going to be a lot of legal red tape and wrangling with the city to replace the scoreboard. Once something is considered a landmark, it's harder than hell to get any changes done.
  17. STUPID BUG! YOU GO SQUISH NOW! /Homer
  18. God dammit. I really hate baseball sometimes.
  19. Because when all else fails, resort to name-calling! Durrr. Both of you, please knock it off. I'm quite serious when I say that I want to change the atmosphere around here. And I fully support you in that. I will stop.
  20. Because when all else fails, resort to name-calling!
  21. As much as I hate them, I do say I admire them clawing back not once but twice last night. That was an impressive effort.
  22. Just don't watch tonight. There's no way the Cardinals are losing. Careful. Making predictions on who's going to win baseball games (other than the Cubs) pisses people right the [expletive] off 'round these parts. ^^^ Case in point.
  23. That will never happen, nor am I sure I would want it to. What would be a workable solution would be to install such systems so that the umpire's strike zone accuracy and consistency could be tracked and policed. Home plate umpire variability is one of the most annoying parts about baseball to me. This x1000.
×
×
  • Create New...