I don't believe that's true, at all. If Manning is healthy the Colts will retain him. He, however, is not likely at all to be healthy by March 8, so they're not going to retain him. I don't know. With all the holes they have do they really want to commit $28 million to a QB who may have 3-4 more years left, or use that money to sign some good FA's and just stick with Luck through his growing pains? When that quarterback is (a healthy) Peyton Manning, yes. A million times yes. He's worth well more than $28 million. The Colts had these same holes -- perhaps less than they do now -- the year before and won 10 games, hosted a playoff game, and, if the new kickoff rules were in effect, would have won that playoff game. Every team has holes -- New England was thirty-first in total defense, the Giants twenty-seventh, the Packers thirty-second, and New Orleans twenty-fourth. You simply do not discard a healthy Peyton Manning for "the future." Things change way, way too fast in the NFL to take such things for granted. And, as far as the cap hit goes, this year the Colts used, roughly, 16.5 percent of the cap on quarterbacks; next year, Manning/Luck/scrub would use about 18 percent of the cap. To be fair, though, the Packers discarded a healthy Brett Favre for "the future" and I think it worked out pretty well.