Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    BREAKING: Cubs Sign Third Baseman Alex Bregman to Five-Year Deal

    The Cubs got their man this time. With the largest annual average value in team history and the long-term, no-opt-out structure they craved last winter, they’ve signed Alex Bregman.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Brian Fluharty-Imagn Imagesan F

    Cubs Video

    The Chicago Cubs and third baseman Alex Bregman have agreed to a five year, $175-million deal, sources confirmed to North Side Baseball. 

    Bregman, who will turn 32 in March, gets the largest AAV in Cubs history, at $35 million. The deal spares the team from having to spread money out into Bregman's late 30s and early 40s, though it almost guarantees that they will surpass the competitive-balance tax threshold for 2026—and perhaps years to come.
     
    In exchange for that, the Cubs get a player who fits their offensive philosophy perfectly. Bregman makes exceptionally good swing decisions and has run superb contact rates almost throughout his career. He lacks high-end bat speed, but creates power by excelling at pulling the ball in the air. He also plays a sturdy third base, and his arrival carries interesting implications for Matt Shaw and Nico Hoerner.
     
    Things were very different for Bregman this year, untethered from the qualifying offer but one year older and with a platform season in which he hit brilliantly early, got hurt, then struggled at times in the second half. Instead of being open to flexible structures and locking in on deals that offered him quick paths back to free agency, Bregman and agent Scott Boras sought a lucrative long-term deal. The Red Sox, who wooed Bregman with a deferral structure and multiple opt-outs last winter, were willing to go longer than the Cubs in terms of years, but refused to pay the high AAV the Cubs offered.
     
    Once he landed Edward Cabrera in a trade earlier this week, Hoyer got permission from ownership to exceed the CBT threshold in order to sign either Bregman or Bo Bichette, a source familiar with the team's plans said. That allowed Chicago to scale up its offer to Bregman, and helped them land the player they hoped would be the capstone to their offseason last year.
     
    In 10 big-league seasons, Bregman has had an on-base percentage under .350 just twice: in 2016 and in 2024. After being in the Astros organization for nearly a decade, he signed with the Red Sox in February and batted .273/.360/.462 in 495 plate appearances. That marked his highest slugging average since 2019, and with the deep well at Wrigley Field replacing the Green Monster in left field for his home games this year, don't expect him to slug as much for the Cubs. However, he adds a much-needed right-handed threat to their lineup, and will spend lots of time hitting between Michael Busch and Ian Happ or Moisés Ballesteros, giving the Cubs terrific lineup depth and balance.
     
    With Bregman locked up (and locked in, with a full no-trade clause, a source said), the team's infield is in for a shakeup. Dansby Swanson will be the shortstop for at least another year or two, but Matt Shaw has been displaced from the lineup. That could be a temporary change, with Nico Hoerner a free agent after 2026, but it could also prove to be permanent. Bregman is likely to stay at third base. Shaw could slide to second if Hoerner is traded, but the team could also plan to rotate him in as a backup at both second and third (with Hoerner sometimes spelling Swanson at shortstop) and/or to use Bregman as the designated hitter on a semi-regular basis, especially against left-handed pitchers.
     
    The ramifications of the deal will spread out and become clearer in the weeks ahead. For now, what we can say for sure is that the Cubs are serious about challenging the Brewers in the NL Central—and in 2026, they might just overtake them.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    KCCub

    Posted

     

     

    • Like 1
    Cuzi

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, TarzanJoeWallis said:

    Sounded to me like he was talking about the Red Sox, not the Cubs, when he was saying they had made an offer early in the offseason. 

    Yes, However, he said there was another offer higher on the table and then and only then did the Red Sox go to 5/165. The 5/165 number has been rumored for at least a week.

    I don't know if that higher offer was from the Cubs though. There were a few teams that seemed to gain a little more interest in Bregman after the Japanese market dried up.

    Cuzi

    Posted

    1 minute ago, KCCub said:

    Probably -

     

     

    Really wish if they were willing to do this deal today, that they just did this horsefeathers last year and pushed a little harder to actually compete with Kyle Tucker.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, KCCub said:

     

     

    It's clear these kinds of things matter to the Cubs. Matt alluded to Swanson in the same fashion in his article about Bichette and the Cubs and how the Cubs felt Swanson was a special case because of both his on the field play but his clubhouse presence. And I kind of get it; if you're hitching your wagon to someone for 5-7 years, you probably want to ensure that the player is going to be a positive in the clubhouse for those 5-7 years.

    • Like 3
    Bertz

    Posted

    12 minutes ago, TarzanJoeWallis said:

    Sounded to me like he was talking about the Red Sox, not the Cubs, when he was saying they had made an offer early in the offseason. 

    So the way I took AJ's story was this

    - Sox made an offer early in the offseason

    - Boras goes to the Red Sox and says "we have a better offer than that"

    - Red Sox say "Sure, Jan"

    - Boras goes back to the Red Sox like "no really we have a better offer than that"

    - Red Sox up their offer to it's final form ($165 with crazy deferrals)

    - Boras says that's not quite enough

    - Red Sox scoff and say "fine then take it" and then he does

    So like I'm wondering if the Cubs have had their offer out there for weeks (a month?) or if there's been multiple rounds of offers and the Cubs were just consistently ahead of the Sox.

    Doesn't matter a ton either way, but would speak to Jed's aggressiveness.  Like if 5/$175 has just been hanging out there since like the winter meetings that'd be wild.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    So the way I took AJ's story was this

    - Sox made an offer early in the offseason

    - Boras goes to the Red Sox and says "we have a better offer than that"

    - Red Sox say "Sure, Jan"

    - Boras goes back to the Red Sox like "no really we have a better offer than that"

    - Red Sox up their offer to it's final form ($165 with crazy deferrals)

    - Boras says that's not quite enough

    - Red Sox scoff and say "fine then take it" and then he does

    So like I'm wondering if the Cubs have had their offer out there for weeks (a month?) or if there's been multiple rounds of offers and the Cubs were just consistently ahead of the Sox.

    Doesn't matter a ton either way, but would speak to Jed's aggressiveness.  Like if 5/$175 has just been hanging out there since like the winter meetings that'd be wild.

    Based on how the Cubs have approached the offseason, it would seem a bit like the Cubs may have. You figure they pivoted from King pretty quickly, wanted to keep the AAV on Imai as low as possible, refused to do an opt-out deal there (higher AAV), signed guys like Tyler Austin, Jacob Webb and everyone on super cheap deals from essentially the WM's on. And Matt spoke about the Cubs looking to pair Imai with Bregman. 

    KCCub

    Posted (edited)

    8 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    So the way I took AJ's story was this

    - Sox made an offer early in the offseason

    - Boras goes to the Red Sox and says "we have a better offer than that"

    - Red Sox say "Sure, Jan"

    - Boras goes back to the Red Sox like "no really we have a better offer than that"

    - Red Sox up their offer to it's final form ($165 with crazy deferrals)

    - Boras says that's not quite enough

    - Red Sox scoff and say "fine then take it" and then he does

    So like I'm wondering if the Cubs have had their offer out there for weeks (a month?) or if there's been multiple rounds of offers and the Cubs were just consistently ahead of the Sox.

    Doesn't matter a ton either way, but would speak to Jed's aggressiveness.  Like if 5/$175 has just been hanging out there since like the winter meetings that'd be wild.

    I think the Sox original offer was something like 4/$135 and then upped to 5/$165 once Boras initially said they had a better offer on the table. I doubt the specific offer of 5/$175 has been there since winter meetings, but yea, do believe it's possible that the Cubs had their best offer in a few weeks ago and Bregman/Boras tried to get the Sox to top it. 

    Edited by KCCub
    ILMindState

    Posted

    22 minutes ago, KCCub said:

     

     

    He's the new Justin Turner but not washed. This is also why they were reluctant to give Tucker the bag. Tucker is not really a leader type, he's seems kind of like a bland quite dude that is there along for the ride.

    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    On 1/11/2026 at 1:02 PM, Gjfificifjdej said:

    Most professional athletes are not the kinds of people I would want kids looking up to, this has been the case for my entire life. I wouldn’t be able to enjoy sports if I required the players on my favourite teams to be good human beings. I assume you didn’t watch any games last year because Tucker, another member of the sign stealing Astros was on the team?

    Tucker was not on the 2017 team. And he barely played in ‘18-‘19.  He was a rookie  And there’s no evidence he knew about the cheating. His performance improved post 2019. 
     

    I don’t ask for athletes to be perfect persons.  But stealing is a crime I won’t tolerate.  Too bad you don’t see that, or you’re okay with it. Bregman et al took the wealth of other players,  And they thought it was fun. Hoyer is a knucklehead for hiring a thief. 

    • Disagree 1
    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    On 1/11/2026 at 1:08 PM, Bertz said:

    Something to keep in mind with adding Bregman to an already full lineup.  The level of health the Cubs got on the position player side last year was extremely fortunate.  And of course health aside if the bench had been less terrible each of those guys probably sits an extra 5-10 games organically.

    Absolutely.  I was highly critical of Counsell playing his starters every day in the July/August heat in 2025.  I said he was doing a ‘69 Durocher.  Too bad he is not a student of history. He seems to be more concerned with studying his hair color and granting interviews. 

    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    On 1/11/2026 at 11:27 AM, Jason Ross said:

    The loser they just signed has been the 19th most valuable position player in baseball since 2022. I'd like it if the Cubs signed more losers like that.

    He cheated his way to fame.  His performance is just above average outside the cheating years. Those years skewed his overall numbers.  Take a look at them before you say how great he is …

    • Disagree 1
    • Haha 2
    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Banks-Williams said:

    He cheated his way to fame.  His performance is just above average outside the cheating years. Those years skewed his overall numbers.  Take a look at them before you say how great he is …

    The cheating scandal was in 2017. How do you suppose that is reflected in the data from 2022 to now? 

    CubUgly

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Hot Sauce said:

    The Cubs have the ability to overpay where a good 2/3 of the league doesn't. This is absolutely how they should approach free agency and the players they covet. It's nice to see them act like the big market team that they are.

    I can't say I'm always good with an overpay, but I'm typically more concerned with overpay in years more than $$$.  I'm good with both with Bregman, I agree with the Cubs that he will age relatively well. 

    KCCub

    Posted

    38 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

    The cheating scandal was in 2017. How do you suppose that is reflected in the data from 2022 to now? 

    He was obviously still cheating duh. Especially the first half of last season where he had around a 160 wRC+ pre injury but stopped cheating post injury. 

    I'm sure every other org was squeaky clean and wasn't experimenting with non traditional forms of sign stealing. We're only talking about billion dollar organizations here, they don't have a lot on the line...

    PeanutPunch33

    Posted

    Getting Bregman + Cabrera are monster moves.  Great off season so far!

    • Like 2
    CubinNY

    Posted

    Get over the cheating horsefeathers. Baseball players have been cheating since Old Hoss Radbourn hawked a loogie on a Spalding and made it dance. 

    There are guys cheating now, and we won't know about it until someone finds out. 

    Just get over it. 

    We Got The Whole 9

    Posted

    And while you're at it, find other ways to evaluate baseball players than Batting Average and Home Runs.

    jersey cubs fan

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Jason Ross said:

    The cheating scandal was in 2017. How do you suppose that is reflected in the data from 2022 to now? 

    What’s his MAR in that timeframe? 
     

     

     

    Morality Above Replacement 

    • Haha 2
    Hot Sauce

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Jason Ross said:

    It's clear these kinds of things matter to the Cubs. Matt alluded to Swanson in the same fashion in his article about Bichette and the Cubs and how the Cubs felt Swanson was a special case because of both his on the field play but his clubhouse presence. And I kind of get it; if you're hitching your wagon to someone for 5-7 years, you probably want to ensure that the player is going to be a positive in the clubhouse for those 5-7 years.

    This is the kind of stuff that will sell me on a move I wasn’t overly enthusiastic about. Great to hear!

    imb

    Posted

    the nsbb urge to argue with every coot who shows up talking about "whatever happened to batting average and sac bunts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

    • Love 1
    Rcal10

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Jason Ross said:

    It's clear these kinds of things matter to the Cubs. Matt alluded to Swanson in the same fashion in his article about Bichette and the Cubs and how the Cubs felt Swanson was a special case because of both his on the field play but his clubhouse presence. And I kind of get it; if you're hitching your wagon to someone for 5-7 years, you probably want to ensure that the player is going to be a positive in the clubhouse for those 5-7 years.

    Which, IMO, is why I don’t think they were interested in Tucker. Not a bad guy, but not a leader and a bit of a loner. 

    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Jason Ross said:

    The cheating scandal was in 2017. How do you suppose that is reflected in the data from 2022 to now? 

    Why would they stop after 2017?  The cheating wasnt revealed until late 2019.  Go on YouTube and watch the videos some sleuths put together sbout 2018-19. Altuve’s 2019 game 6 ALCS walk-off homer is highly questionable. Ken Rosenthal was bery suspicious and questioned him about why he prevented his teammates from removing his shirt.  Arrolis Chapman, the pitcher, believed he was cheating as well. The necklace beneath his shirt is believed to have contained a signaling device. Altuve gave some very strange answers when questioned about the fear of shirt removal (he’d removed it a few times before).  Go watch the videos, and you’ll be convinced they were cheating in 2019 up to at least the end of the ALCS. 

    macarthur31

    Posted

    Rates and Barrels pod with Eno Sarris and Derek VanRipen spend the first 35 minutes of this ep examining the Bregman signing, as well as the knock on effects for Matt Shaw.   Sarris notes that Bregman is 40% better than league average at both walking and not striking out, and that combo is unicorn type stuff.  He generates the comps list of 8 other players that have done that in MLB history, and how they did after age 31.  There's some serious variance: Lenny Dykstra was the lowest, having generated 5.6 WAR while Joe Morgan put up 46.7 WAR!  Sarris notes: "...just not striking out and walking and having defensive value like he does...puts him in a place where the average guy that was his comp after 31 put another 20 wins on the table..."  Of course, injuries can happen and it could be cut short - but overall, that's a good list to be on.

    • Like 2
    • Love 1



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...