I share the video not just because the clickbaity title reveals how my algorithm is tilted (though to be fair, the back end of his opening statement after he calls them frauds is, "they're also very good...particularly their offense..."), but rather since the Cubs have similar outcomes to the Brewers, you see them in comparison on the data tables shared.
The "too long, didn't watch" of it is: Since 2025, the Brewers have collectively been an elite run producing team because they are disproportiately good vs. pitchers who don't throw hard, don't throw strikes, and don't prevent runs, a.k.a. "The Mitch Keller Theory" because over the course of 162 games, teams have to account for 1400+ innings, and half of those they're facing a pitcher worse that Mitch Keller.
OK, here's the Cub side of it:
Since '25, the Cubs have the best wOBA against the bottom 48 pitchers (.380)
However, unlike the Brewers, they have the best wOBA (.311) against the top 48 pitchers.
The Cubs are the 3rd BEST vs pitches below 98 mph.
However, they're the 3rd WORST wOBA vs. pitches above 98MPH
This is significant given that the playoff pitching ramps up in velo as teams are facing the 1-3 starter and high lev relievers. (Note the average 4S FB during the '25 regular season is clocked at 94.5 MPH v '25 playoffs at 95.8 MPH.)
Like the Brewers, the Cubs are super patient - both teams are at the bottom of the Chase Rate% and Swing% tables in 2026, and conversely the top of the BB% rate.
While the Brewers are 28th in HRs since 2025 (266), the Cubs are 4th (357).
And a scan of the '26 leaderboards show that the Cubs are 6th in SLG (.415) while the Brewers are 20th (.398)
All this to say, yeah Yankees series was hella frustrating; but in the aggregate, the Cubs have terrific balance on offense, even with their weakness against elite velo. In light of this, this really affirms why Jed pushed the pedal down at TDL.