Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    BREAKING: Cubs Sign Third Baseman Alex Bregman to Five-Year Deal

    The Cubs got their man this time. With the largest annual average value in team history and the long-term, no-opt-out structure they craved last winter, they’ve signed Alex Bregman.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Brian Fluharty-Imagn Imagesan F

    Cubs Video

    The Chicago Cubs and third baseman Alex Bregman have agreed to a five year, $175-million deal, sources confirmed to North Side Baseball. 

    Bregman, who will turn 32 in March, gets the largest AAV in Cubs history, at $35 million. The deal spares the team from having to spread money out into Bregman's late 30s and early 40s, though it almost guarantees that they will surpass the competitive-balance tax threshold for 2026—and perhaps years to come.
     
    In exchange for that, the Cubs get a player who fits their offensive philosophy perfectly. Bregman makes exceptionally good swing decisions and has run superb contact rates almost throughout his career. He lacks high-end bat speed, but creates power by excelling at pulling the ball in the air. He also plays a sturdy third base, and his arrival carries interesting implications for Matt Shaw and Nico Hoerner.
     
    Things were very different for Bregman this year, untethered from the qualifying offer but one year older and with a platform season in which he hit brilliantly early, got hurt, then struggled at times in the second half. Instead of being open to flexible structures and locking in on deals that offered him quick paths back to free agency, Bregman and agent Scott Boras sought a lucrative long-term deal. The Red Sox, who wooed Bregman with a deferral structure and multiple opt-outs last winter, were willing to go longer than the Cubs in terms of years, but refused to pay the high AAV the Cubs offered.
     
    Once he landed Edward Cabrera in a trade earlier this week, Hoyer got permission from ownership to exceed the CBT threshold in order to sign either Bregman or Bo Bichette, a source familiar with the team's plans said. That allowed Chicago to scale up its offer to Bregman, and helped them land the player they hoped would be the capstone to their offseason last year.
     
    In 10 big-league seasons, Bregman has had an on-base percentage under .350 just twice: in 2016 and in 2024. After being in the Astros organization for nearly a decade, he signed with the Red Sox in February and batted .273/.360/.462 in 495 plate appearances. That marked his highest slugging average since 2019, and with the deep well at Wrigley Field replacing the Green Monster in left field for his home games this year, don't expect him to slug as much for the Cubs. However, he adds a much-needed right-handed threat to their lineup, and will spend lots of time hitting between Michael Busch and Ian Happ or Moisés Ballesteros, giving the Cubs terrific lineup depth and balance.
     
    With Bregman locked up (and locked in, with a full no-trade clause, a source said), the team's infield is in for a shakeup. Dansby Swanson will be the shortstop for at least another year or two, but Matt Shaw has been displaced from the lineup. That could be a temporary change, with Nico Hoerner a free agent after 2026, but it could also prove to be permanent. Bregman is likely to stay at third base. Shaw could slide to second if Hoerner is traded, but the team could also plan to rotate him in as a backup at both second and third (with Hoerner sometimes spelling Swanson at shortstop) and/or to use Bregman as the designated hitter on a semi-regular basis, especially against left-handed pitchers.
     
    The ramifications of the deal will spread out and become clearer in the weeks ahead. For now, what we can say for sure is that the Cubs are serious about challenging the Brewers in the NL Central—and in 2026, they might just overtake them.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos

    Cubs Top Prospects

    Juan Cabada

    DSL Cubs - Rookie, SS
    Two days after turning 18, Cabada made his State-side debut. Batting third and playing second base, he went 3-for-5 with a triple and three RBI.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Stratos

    Posted

    4 hours ago, Rcal10 said:

    Cool. It is the few million that matter, if you believe they want to stay under. I honestly am not sure they care. Also, Bregman didn’t have a QO attached, right? Another small win. 

    Yeah with the deferrals and no QO the contract doesn't really seem overpriced anymore.

    Stratos

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Rcal10 said:

    I could see a Rea trade as well. But if they are just under I can also see Assad traded instead of Rea. It isn’t a big salary relief, but it is something. Maybe they sit $3M under. They would be able to add something at the TDL, if they had to do something. Plus, if all pitchers are healthy, they would have 6 pitchers. Maybe they move Tailon then. 

    I they'd be insane to trade Rea to save a small bit of LT hit.

    Hunter

    Posted

    Pretty sure if we put every player under a microscope we would find something. Maybe put yourself under the microscope? Might find a lot you don't like either. A lot of players cheat on their WAGs, or they cheat on their taxes. Bet some even cheated on tests in school. Point is, don't put any of them on a pedestal as a role model. Baseball is just a game. Need to teach your kids there are more important things in life. 

    • Like 2
    ToolDRT

    Posted

    23 minutes ago, vance_the_cubs_fan said:

    I have heard something that would confirm this. 

    Oh come on, can’t just stop there!

    • Like 1
    Rcal10

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Stratos said:

    I they'd be insane to trade Rea to save a small bit of LT hit.

    This is a bit of an overreaction. They would save $6M to be able to spend at the TDL if they traded their swing starter/multi inning relief pitcher. Basically JAG. I agree they don’t need to do this. But insane if they did? Nope. 

    KCCub

    Posted (edited)

    10 minutes ago, Hunter said:

    Pretty sure if we put every player under a microscope we would find something. Maybe put yourself under the microscope? Might find a lot you don't like either. A lot of players cheat on their WAGs, or they cheat on their taxes. Bet some even cheated on tests in school. Point is, don't put any of them on a pedestal as a role model. Baseball is just a game. Need to teach your kids there are more important things in life. 

    Fully agree. I learned long ago athletes aren’t great role models. Some of them are fantastic humans, some of them you believe are and then years later find out they weren’t. I made a stance years ago that if the league allows said player to be in the league, then I’m fine with them being on my team. I’ll have my favorites, but they’re mostly just assets to me at this point (across all sports). 

    Edited by KCCub
    Bull

    Posted

    59 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    Something to keep in mind with adding Bregman to an already full lineup.  The level of health the Cubs got on the position player side last year was extremely fortunate.  And of course health aside if the bench had been less terrible each of those guys probably sits an extra 5-10 games organically.

    I really think they find a way to get Shaw 400-500 PAs and ^^^this^^^ is why.

    I wonder if he could cover CF in a pinch. 

    • Like 1
    vance_the_cubs_fan

    Posted

    21 minutes ago, ToolDRT said:

    Oh come on, can’t just stop there!

    It's more of my daughter's roommate is related to someone who has access to people who work for the Cubs. My daughter said she heard something to that effect when I was discussing Tucker. So lots of heresay, and probably just noise, but I did offer it up. 

    Illiterate Scholar

    Posted

    15 minutes ago, Bull said:

    I really think they find a way to get Shaw 400-500 PAs and ^^^this^^^ is why.

    I wonder if he could cover CF in a pinch. 

    I kinda think he's gonna open up as the backup in CF. I have doubts that all 3 of Shaw, Ballesteros, and Alcantara will open the season on the MLB roster, barring injury to someone else. In theory, there's enough ABs but in reality the starters aren't the type who are going to get many days off unless they're injured, in which case depth ready to go in the minors is still helpful. Feels like one of the bench spots will go to a vet who they don't care if he gets like 4 ABs in April.

    Thurman Merman

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, Illiterate Scholar said:

    I kinda think he's gonna open up as the backup in CF. I have doubts that all 3 of Shaw, Ballesteros, and Alcantara will open the season on the MLB roster, barring injury to someone else. In theory, there's enough ABs but in reality the starters aren't the type who are going to get many days off unless they're injured, in which case depth ready to go in the minors is still helpful. Feels like one of the bench spots will go to a vet who they don't care if he gets like 4 ABs in April.

    The jaguar can't hit in April anyway so I think we will all be fine if he's on the team and gets 4 abs.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, Illiterate Scholar said:

    I kinda think he's gonna open up as the backup in CF. I have doubts that all 3 of Shaw, Ballesteros, and Alcantara will open the season on the MLB roster, barring injury to someone else. In theory, there's enough ABs but in reality the starters aren't the type who are going to get many days off unless they're injured, in which case depth ready to go in the minors is still helpful. Feels like one of the bench spots will go to a vet who they don't care if he gets like 4 ABs in April.

    I think the only one who might not be here in April is Alcantara, assuming no trades. No chance Shaw isn’t here and I really think Ballesteros is the DH. Maybe they add a lefty outfielder, (Tauchman) but I doubt it. 

    UMFan83

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Jason Ross said:

    I don't think that will be the case. I cannot see a trade that would make any sense.

    I just worry that the Cubs sit like $1m away from the tax, Nico is making $11m next year, and is a FA after the season. If they were looking to give themselves some wiggle room for additional moves now or at the deadline what other moves are out there or would they actually dare to go over the tax?

    Seiya is in a similar boat but OF is a lot thinner. Maybe a SP but doubt they will want to reduce depth there. 

    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, UMFan83 said:

    If they were looking to give themselves some wiggle room for additional moves now or at the deadline what other moves are out there or would they actually dare to go over the tax?

    Trading Taillon

    Rcal10

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    Trading Taillon

    I don’t think they do that now. He is 1 or 5 rotation pieces. And they don’t need that much money for the deadline. But Rea makes sense. He is a spot starter/multi inning guy. Assad can take that role. They already have Webb, Harvey, Maton, Palencia, Milner, Theilbar and then guys like Assad, Brown, Wicks, Little, Hodge and probably a few I am forgetting. They can spare Rea. 

    Bertz

    Posted

    19 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    Trading Taillon

    Even setting aside finances his feels like something the team should consider.  The lineup has this really nice blend of promising youth and veteran production that does a fantastic job of balancing 2026 and beyond.  The pitching staff very much does not.  Sure you can moreso count on injury opening up playing time on that side of the ball, but even so it feels like a bad idea to have Wicks/Brown/Wiggins so far down the depth chart.  Especially since it's not a super tough argument to make that they're likely better than Jamo outright.

    Maybe wait until mid March to make sure the baseball gods didn't decide to go on a Mesa UCL shredding spree?  Has the bonus of maybe being able to find a motivated buyer after injuries strike another camp.

    Gjfificifjdej

    Posted

    47 minutes ago, ToolDRT said:

     

    Getting outbid by Hoyer is crazy work

    • Like 2
    Bull

    Posted

    33 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    I don’t think they do that now. He is 1 or 5 rotation pieces. And they don’t need that much money for the deadline. But Rea makes sense. He is a spot starter/multi inning guy. Assad can take that role. They already have Webb, Harvey, Maton, Palencia, Milner, Theilbar and then guys like Assad, Brown, Wicks, Little, Hodge and probably a few I am forgetting. They can spare Rea. 

    Counsell is not letting go of Rea.

    JHBulls

    Posted

    I have been out of the loop for two days and only just found out about this. My jaw dropped when I read the front page of this forum just now. Wow. 

    CubUgly

    Posted

    8 hours ago, Rcal10 said:

    Wow. First the Cubs act like a major market by targeting a guy and getting him. And now we learn they also did it using deferred money. What a great turn of events. Not sure what was more unexpected. This deal or the Bears comeback. 

    ICGAF the reason.  Glad tbey did it. 

    chopsx9

    Posted

    I don't really get the $ to WAR thing.  Are we saying Nico is going to get between $30-$50 million a year wherever he signs?  Someone educate me.

    ILMindState

    Posted

    The offseason was looking kinda bleak after the Imai signing. What a difference a week makes !

    Victor Reichman

    Posted

    I like Bregman, fine player, but not for 5 yrs and $35/yr. Shaw is a better fielder, came in 2nd to Hayes, far faster, hit 10 HR in 2nd half, and is inexpensive. We had a Gold Glove IF last year. IMO, they offered Nico an extension which he refused and he wants to play for SF or LA. Clearly, best position player on team last year. Seems they might trade either him or Swanson. They must keep Shaw.

    Stratos

    Posted

    4 hours ago, Bull said:

    I really think they find a way to get Shaw 400-500 PAs and ^^^this^^^ is why.

    I wonder if he could cover CF in a pinch. 

    Yeah they need to do a much better job at resting guys this year.  They couldn't afford to rest Dansby, Nico, PCA last year.  I think Shaw should make this easier




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...