Vote for #6 Prospect

[jumbo]

6-Jackson-closeness to majors, belief in all around game and at least adjustment to acceotable K-rate

7-Paniagua-Law reports, signing/interest by three teams

8-Candelario/Villenueva-Candelario upside and age relative to competition/Villanueva solid defense and closer proximity to majors

[Cubswin11]

Maples

Paniagua

Vitters

[82TonyM]

6. Jackson

7. Maples

8. Paniagua

[davell]

Time to start number 7?

[Guest]

Is it close enough we should have a run-off between Jackson and Paniagua or are my personal biases showing?

[davell]

Is it close enough we should have a run-off between Jackson and Paniagua or are my personal biases showing?

Its showing.

[Guest]

35-30 is close enough, considering there have been 133 votes.

[Rob]

Close as it is, I'd just give Paniagua 7 and not waste another day on voting.

[davell]

Then again, I voted for Brett at 6, so maybe I'm biased too.

[Guest]

Close as it is, I'd just give Paniagua 7 and not waste another day on voting.

 

On the flip side, as Rob alludes to, time is of the essence too.

[davell]

Yeah, I'm fine with giving Paniagua 7 and starting the vote on 8, maybe with a provision that moving forward, if a vote is within 3, a runoff is done with both guys getting next two spots. If vote is within 5, both spots taken as well?