Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
In 2016 when we are enjoying the next Mark Prior, I hope everyone remembers why it was worth tanking this year.

The next Mark Prior? No thanks. I'll take the next Justin Verlander or Clayton Kershaw though.

Mark Prior was that good.

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
In 2016 when we are enjoying the next Mark Prior, I hope everyone remembers why it was worth tanking this year.

The next Mark Prior? No thanks. I'll take the next Justin Verlander or Clayton Kershaw though.

Mark Prior was that good.

For about two seasons. It's about sustaining success though if this team is going to be successful. You need a reliable guy that will stay healthy and do it year after year.

Posted
In 2016 when we are enjoying the next Mark Prior, I hope everyone remembers why it was worth tanking this year.

The next Mark Prior? No thanks. I'll take the next Justin Verlander or Clayton Kershaw though.

Mark Prior was that good.

For about two seasons. It's about sustaining success though if this team is going to be successful. You need a reliable guy that will stay healthy and do it year after year.

Since I think the blame for that lies mainly on the cubs front office and dusty baker I'm ok with getting that type of talent again.

Posted

In 1965 the CUBS finished 72-90..... good for 8th place in a 10 team league. During that off season the CUBS went out and hired Leo Durocher as their new manager. Upon his hiring, he proclaimed, "This is not an 8th place ball club." He was, off course, correct. As the 1966 CUBS finished 59-103 dead last and 7.5 games behind the 9th place Mets !!!

 

 

Go CUBS !!

Posted
The train has come off the tracks...the march to 100 losses is back on.

 

Which is the only reason you're back.

That is where you are wrong Numb Nuts. I mean Nuts&Gum.

 

Like most here, I did not have a lot of expectations this year, but I never thought I'd be watching a game in which Reed Johnson, Jeff Baker and Koyie Hill started after Theo and Company were hired. Trust me, I would much rather be watching young players gaining valuable experience than watch terrible veterans lose again and again.

 

You basically don't post when they win. You only post to wallow in misery.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
In 1965 the CUBS finished 72-90..... good for 8th place in a 10 team league. During that off season the CUBS went out and hired Leo Durocher as their new manager. Upon his hiring, he proclaimed, "This is not an 8th place ball club." He was, off course, correct. As the 1966 CUBS finished 59-103 dead last and 7.5 games behind the 9th place Mets !!!

 

 

Go CUBS !!

 

Haha, we needed something inspirational!

Posted
In 2016 when we are enjoying the next Mark Prior, I hope everyone remembers why it was worth tanking this year.

The next Mark Prior? No thanks. I'll take the next Justin Verlander or Clayton Kershaw though.

Mark Prior was that good.

For about two seasons. It's about sustaining success though if this team is going to be successful. You need a reliable guy that will stay healthy and do it year after year.

 

Yeah, you need a guy who will reliably not get run over by Marcus Giles or take a line drive off of the elbow.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Last week, we were putting odds out on whether we could reach. 500 this year or not. Now we're on a pace to lose 100 games. Funny thing is though, if we can multiply everything by 4 right now and end the season, I'd do it and not think twice.
Posted
Nice words from Brenneman about Caray, Brenly, Santo etc

 

And here I was about to complain about all of that as a parade of typical Fox meatball-ism along with 2003, the WS drought, etc., etc..

Posted
In 1965 the CUBS finished 72-90..... good for 8th place in a 10 team league. During that off season the CUBS went out and hired Leo Durocher as their new manager. Upon his hiring, he proclaimed, "This is not an 8th place ball club." He was, off course, correct. As the 1966 CUBS finished 59-103 dead last and 7.5 games behind the 9th place Mets !!!

 

 

Go CUBS !!

 

Haha, we needed something inspirational!

 

Yeah, and I'm sorry I wasn't able to give it to you ! :wink:

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Last week, we were putting odds out on whether we could reach. 500 this year or not.

 

I think, like, 4 people were doing that.

I know that. My point is we're walking a fine line between sucking, but seeing enough positives that to me, the losses don't matter at all.

Posted
Adam Dunn has as many walks this game as Starlin Castro has all season.

 

I'm really not a fan of Castro hitting #3. He's an excellent hitter, and I know lineup roles are vastly overrated/overstated, but he just doesn't have the patience and power to hold it down. He's aggressive enough that I think it can play to his worse tendencies given the expectations that comes with #3.

 

And yes, I know he's not having a bad year; he's still young enough that I'd rather not pen him in to a slot that he shouldn't ideally be playing ASAP.

Posted
Last week, we were putting odds out on whether we could reach. 500 this year or not.

 

I think, like, 4 people were doing that.

I know that. My point is we're walking a fine line between sucking, but seeing enough positives that to me, the losses don't matter at all.

 

There are more people here who get annoyed that this team is so unnecessarily bad than were picking them to maybe be decent a week ago.

Posted
The train has come off the tracks...the march to 100 losses is back on.

 

Which is the only reason you're back.

That is where you are wrong Numb Nuts. I mean Nuts&Gum.

 

Like most here, I did not have a lot of expectations this year, but I never thought I'd be watching a game in which Reed Johnson, Jeff Baker and Koyie Hill started after Theo and Company were hired. Trust me, I would much rather be watching young players gaining valuable experience than watch terrible veterans lose again and again.

 

You basically don't post when they win. You only post to wallow in misery.

And you basically post to take shots at other posters.

 

I post when I get a chance and this year there is a real good probability they will lose at those times when I can post. But really, I am not mad about them losing necessarily. It is just very disappointing to watch these bad veterans given more opportunities.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Last week, we were putting odds out on whether we could reach. 500 this year or not.

 

I think, like, 4 people were doing that.

I know that. My point is we're walking a fine line between sucking, but seeing enough positives that to me, the losses don't matter at all.

 

There are more people here who get annoyed that this team is so unnecessarily bad than were picking them to maybe be decent a week ago.

True. I'm just saying whether we lose 85, 95, or 105 games this year, we've got enough pieces to make major moves next season. And the more losses this year just means more IFA money and better draft positioning. I'm fine with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...