Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

Posted
I live by the theory that a GM is as good as his payroll. Ive always been curious to see how Brian Cashman, Theo Epstein, and of course Jim hendry himself would do with a small market/low budget team. My guess is about as good as Dayton Moore.
Posted
I live by the theory that a GM is as good as his payroll. Ive always been curious to see how Brian Cashman, Theo Epstein, and of course Jim hendry himself would do with a small market/low budget team. My guess is about as good as Dayton Moore.

 

How would you explain Billy Beane's overall success then?

Posted
I live by the theory that a GM is as good as his payroll. Ive always been curious to see how Brian Cashman, Theo Epstein, and of course Jim hendry himself would do with a small market/low budget team. My guess is about as good as Dayton Moore.

 

How would you explain Billy Beane's overall success then?

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/e0/26/f580eb6709a0f3e8180c2110.L.jpg

Posted
I live by the theory that a GM is as good as his payroll. Ive always been curious to see how Brian Cashman, Theo Epstein, and of course Jim hendry himself would do with a small market/low budget team. My guess is about as good as Dayton Moore.

 

How would you explain Billy Beane's overall success then?

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/e0/26/f580eb6709a0f3e8180c2110.L.jpg

 

I've actually never read that.

Posted
I live by the theory that a GM is as good as his payroll. Ive always been curious to see how Brian Cashman, Theo Epstein, and of course Jim hendry himself would do with a small market/low budget team. My guess is about as good as Dayton Moore.

 

How would you explain Billy Beane's overall success then?

 

He exploited under-appreciated means of evaluating players. Now that they're not really under-appreciated anymore, he's been exposed as a fairly mediocre general manager.

Posted
I live by the theory that a GM is as good as his payroll. Ive always been curious to see how Brian Cashman, Theo Epstein, and of course Jim hendry himself would do with a small market/low budget team. My guess is about as good as Dayton Moore.

 

How would you explain Billy Beane's overall success then?

 

He exploited under-appreciated means of evaluating players. Now that they're not really under-appreciated anymore, he's been exposed as a fairly mediocre general manager.

 

Billy has done an OK job with young, unappreciated players, which is why I was surprised when he went after all of these cheap old guy nobody else wanted this past off season. However, if he were hired by the Yankees or Red Sox, do you think hed stick to his same methods?

Posted

I don't know if this is true, but I've heard from a few Royals fans that David Glass is not permitted from profit when he sells the Royals. It was something like a condition of getting the team. The theory goes that he cashes out if the team is contracted, but gets nothing otherwise.

 

So he's basically:

 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_zI2YCpvGIog/RsLyt00p4-I/AAAAAAAAAkg/qnW4x2QPrFo/s400/owner.jpg

 

Now, I don't know if any of this is true, but good lord. He's awful.

 

EDIT: Here's a snippet I found on a KC blog:

 

This is also a good place to remind everyone that terms of David Glass' purchase of the Royals dictate that he cannot profit if and when he sells the team. Whatever profit is made off the sale goes to Kansas City charities, millions and millions and millions of dollars that will only add to Ewing Kauffman's legacy.

 

http://royalsblog.kansascity.com/?q=node/434

Posted
I live by the theory that a GM is as good as his payroll. Ive always been curious to see how Brian Cashman, Theo Epstein, and of course Jim hendry himself would do with a small market/low budget team. My guess is about as good as Dayton Moore.

 

How would you explain Billy Beane's overall success then?

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/e0/26/f580eb6709a0f3e8180c2110.L.jpg

 

So Billy Beane wrote a book. Big deal.

Posted
considering LLFs theory, Larry Beinfest is a mix of Steven Hawking, and Jesus (not far off, really)

 

Considering they're about another year or two away from going on another insane run with talented and promising young players, that really is not that far off.

Posted
I read it to understand that he can't profit from "selling" the team. He can still profit from them if they are a successfully operated franchise, day to day.
Posted
I live by the theory that a GM is as good as his payroll. Ive always been curious to see how Brian Cashman, Theo Epstein, and of course Jim hendry himself would do with a small market/low budget team. My guess is about as good as Dayton Moore.

 

How would you explain Billy Beane's overall success then?

 

He exploited under-appreciated means of evaluating players. Now that they're not really under-appreciated anymore, he's been exposed as a fairly mediocre general manager.

 

I'm not sure if I'd call Beane a mediocre GM, but that's beside the point.

 

WSR said that a GM is as good as his payroll, but Beane has shown that a GM can have an extended period of success with a very small payroll. It can be done and some have done it, but it is very difficult.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...