Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

Posted

according to BA:

 

3/4 delivery

 

Low 90's fastball (90-92) with good sink

 

Slurvy breaking ball (has trouble staying "on top")

 

Unreliable changeup

 

Reportedly has poor command, but his K/BB numbers have improved every year. He misses a lot of bats. I've never seen him play, so all this is just based on what I've read.

Guest
Guests
Posted
From all I can tell, his changeup is much more reliable at Daytona this season. Didn't understand their poor command comment.
Posted
From all I can tell, his changeup is much more reliable at Daytona this season. Didn't understand their poor command comment.

 

Yeah, that was from BA's handbook. It doesn't make sense if you look at his BB/9 and K/BB numbers. :?

Guest
Guests
Posted
From all I can tell, his changeup is much more reliable at Daytona this season. Didn't understand their poor command comment.

 

Yeah, that was from BA's handbook. It doesn't make sense if you look at his BB/9 and K/BB numbers. :?

 

I assume they meant command of his secondary pitches, but I still think he has pretty good command of them. I think BA lowballed Mitch Atkins in last year's top 30 list.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Atkins has been pretty strongly fly-ball oriented this year, and has been HR-prone throughout his career. So, I'm suspecting that just as BA's report may be not very accurate on it's negatives, I wonder if it isn't also baloney on the positive, the sinker. Not many sinkerballers who get as few groundouts as Mitch, at least not if their sinker is at all good.

 

The other thing is that Atkins had shoulder trouble earlier this season, I think. Not sure how that may have affected him, how that might be affecting him now, or how that might affect him future.

Posted
Mitch Atkins is terribly under-rated IMO. His numbers over the last two years have been in the same ballpark as Jacob McGee who is only one year younger, yet you never hear about him, whereas everyone loves McGee.
Posted
But while he may talk a little like Mayberry's Gomer Pyle, Atkins is pitching like fellow native North Carolinian Catfish Hunter (ask your father). A fastball that has gained velocity (consistent low-to-mid 90s) since he was drafted out of high school three years ago and a curveball that is just as effective against advanced Class-A hitters as it was in his prep days has Atkins climbing up the minor-league ladder.

 

http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/Sports/Headlines/sptCUBS01061107.htm

Posted
Mitch Atkins is terribly under-rated IMO. His numbers over the last two years have been in the same ballpark as Jacob McGee who is only one year younger, yet you never hear about him, whereas everyone loves McGee.

 

Jacob McGee

Throws: L

Birthday: 8/6/1986

Current Age: 20

Level: A+ (FSL)

2006 Stats (MID): 7-9, 26 GS, 134 IP, 103 H, 7 HR, 171/65 K/BB, 2.96 ERA, 1.02 GO/FO, .211 BAA, 1.25 WHIP

2007 (FSL): 4-2, 13 GS, 70.2 IP, 54 H, 4 HR, 82/24 K/BB, 2.42 ERA, .75 GO/FO, .208 BAA, 1.11 WHIP

 

Mitch Atkins

Throws: R

Birthday: 10/1/1985

Current Age: 21

Level: A+ (FSL)

2006 Stats (MID): 13-4, 25 GS, 138.1 IP, 110 H, 10 HR, 127/53 K/BB, 2.41 ERA, .73 GO/FO, .217 BAA, 1.18 WHIP

2007 (FSL): 5-3, 12 GS, 68.1 IP, 56 H, 7 HR, 49/16 K/BB, 2.24 ERA, .62 GO/FO, .228 BAA, 1.05 WHIP

 

...I'm not seeing it. McGee strikes out more guys by a healthy margin and does a better job of keeping the ball in the park. Plus, McGee's almost year younger and left-handed.

 

That's not taking anything away from Atkins' success, but it's not a comparison that works, imo.

Posted
I guess what I was going for, is that the numbers are not dissimilar enough to the point where Mitch Atkins should barely crack a weaker organization's top thirty. Obviously McGee is one of the top pitching prospects in all of baseball right now, and Atkins is nowhere near that level, it's just that he doesn't get much respect from BA, considering the numbers he has put up, and at least above average stuff(as far as I can tell).
Guest
Guests
Posted
I guess what I was going for, is that the numbers are not dissimilar enough to the point where Mitch Atkins should barely crack a weaker organization's top thirty. Obviously McGee is one of the top pitching prospects in all of baseball right now, and Atkins is nowhere near that level, it's just that he doesn't get much respect from BA, considering the numbers he has put up, and at least above average stuff(as far as I can tell).

 

That I can get behind. He's a top-10 Cubs prospect now, in my opinion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...