Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 892
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I think the defense might be tired - they have been on the field for the 3/4 of the game, wioth Rex Grossman on their collective backs the whole time.
Posted
Again, show me proof that Griese has EVER played this bad.

 

11/9/2003:

 

15/27 131 yds 0 TD 3 INT 27.1 RAT

 

9/30/2002

 

35/53 328 yds 1 TD 3 INT 65.6 RAT

 

1/6/2002

 

16/32 151 yds 1 TD 4 INT 34.2 RAT

Posted
Grossman is playing on a team that has talent enough to win a SB if he just plays avg. He is playing WELL BELOW avg. This is a team that is ready to win NOW, not two years from now like the Titans (Vince Young) or the Cards (Leinart). We can't have patience with Rex b/c windows in the NFL close too quickly.

 

This is a really good point that I was about to mention. The Bears are really set up to win THIS year. Hell, you know the defense is going to be worse next year, just based on the loss of Lance Briggs alone. They have to go for it this season, Grossman's development be damned. If Griese can help the team win more this year, they have to do that.

 

So you'd advocate playing the inferior veteran over the younger player, when the veteran doesn't give you much over the younger player?

 

winning with Lance Briggsat the expense of Developing Rex is not a good strategy for the long term health of the team.

 

Your assumption that Griese would be inferior at this point to Rex is not a supportable assertion.

 

as is your assumption he would be better.

 

Just show me where Griese put up a 0 QB rating. Otherwise your just dead wrong.

 

 

if A = B, and B = C, then Y obviously = cherry pie.

Posted
Again, show me proof that Griese has EVER played this bad.

 

11/9/2003:

 

15/27 131 yds 0 TD 3 INT 27.1 RAT

 

9/30/2002

 

35/53 328 yds 1 TD 3 INT 65.6 RAT

 

1/6/2002

 

16/32 151 yds 1 TD 4 INT 34.2 RAT

 

Easily beats Rex today.

Posted
Grossman is playing on a team that has talent enough to win a SB if he just plays avg. He is playing WELL BELOW avg. This is a team that is ready to win NOW, not two years from now like the Titans (Vince Young) or the Cards (Leinart). We can't have patience with Rex b/c windows in the NFL close too quickly.

 

This is a really good point that I was about to mention. The Bears are really set up to win THIS year. Hell, you know the defense is going to be worse next year, just based on the loss of Lance Briggs alone. They have to go for it this season, Grossman's development be damned. If Griese can help the team win more this year, they have to do that.

 

So you'd advocate playing the inferior veteran over the younger player, when the veteran doesn't give you much over the younger player?

 

winning with Lance Briggsat the expense of Developing Rex is not a good strategy for the long term health of the team.

 

Your assumption that Griese would be inferior at this point to Rex is not a supportable assertion.

 

as is your assumption he would be better.

 

Just show me where Griese put up a 0 QB rating. Otherwise your just dead wrong.

 

 

if A = B, and B = C, then Y obviously = cherry pie.

 

Now Rex NEEDS to play well, otherwise this game is going to be a loss.

 

Let's see how he responds.

Posted
Again, show me proof that Griese has EVER played this bad.

 

11/9/2003:

 

15/27 131 yds 0 TD 3 INT 27.1 RAT

 

9/30/2002

 

35/53 328 yds 1 TD 3 INT 65.6 RAT

 

1/6/2002

 

16/32 151 yds 1 TD 4 INT 34.2 RAT

 

Still better than a 0.0 RAT.

 

If Rex finishes the game with a 0 RAT, you'll be right. However, I doubt that happens.

Posted
Again, show me proof that Griese has EVER played this bad.

 

11/9/2003:

 

15/27 131 yds 0 TD 3 INT 27.1 RAT

 

9/30/2002

 

35/53 328 yds 1 TD 3 INT 65.6 RAT

 

1/6/2002

 

16/32 151 yds 1 TD 4 INT 34.2 RAT

 

Well done - you dug around and found four games (out of how many starts?) from 3 or more years ago that he played badly in. You could do a search and find the same for guys named Manning, Montana, Favre, Luckman, Tittle...just about anyone.

 

Now go and show me where Griese has played this bad over an extended stretch as Rex has.

 

What are Griese's career stats, please?

Posted
Thanks should go out to the refs for allowing the Vikings to make this a 1 point game. I still can't believe they screwed that call up...
Posted
Thanks should go out to the refs for allowing the Vikings to make this a 1 point game. I still can't believe they screwed that call up...

 

You talking about the late hit? Looked like a good call to me, and a dumb move by Chris Harris.

Posted
Again, show me proof that Griese has EVER played this bad.

 

11/9/2003:

 

15/27 131 yds 0 TD 3 INT 27.1 RAT

 

9/30/2002

 

35/53 328 yds 1 TD 3 INT 65.6 RAT

 

1/6/2002

 

16/32 151 yds 1 TD 4 INT 34.2 RAT

 

Well done - you dug around and found four games (out of how many starts?) from 3 or more years ago that he played badly in. You could do a search and find the same for guys named Manning, Montana, Favre, Luckman, Tittle...just about anyone.

 

Now go and show me where Griese has played this bad over an extended stretch as Rex has.

 

What are Griese's career stats, please?

 

Pretty much his entire 2005 was mediorce to bad.

 

Also, Griese's got 10 points of rating and 10 YPG on Rex on their careers, and considering he has about 8 times the starts, that's not impressive.

Posted
Thanks should go out to the refs for allowing the Vikings to make this a 1 point game. I still can't believe they screwed that call up...

 

The Urlacher flexing penalty was on their other FG drive. :?

Posted
Thanks should go out to the refs for allowing the Vikings to make this a 1 point game. I still can't believe they screwed that call up...

 

You talking about the late hit? Looked like a good call to me, and a dumb move by Chris Harris.

What? The non-fumble.

 

Crap...

 

Had his man open, too...

Posted
Thanks should go out to the refs for allowing the Vikings to make this a 1 point game. I still can't believe they screwed that call up...

 

he said "by rule" but I don't know that I've ever heard of said rule. if said rule exists, it is a stupid rule.

 

 

this is going to blamed on Rex too, right?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...