Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
Do you really feel the need to surf the web and find any thread that disparages your beloved team and defend them vigorously?

 

Are you really surprised that you would find threads on a Cubs message board that make fun and sometimes without logic or reason the players on a rival team?

 

Does it make you a better person to come here and defend him ad nauseum? You complain about "our originality" but your schtick has grown old.

 

Do you do this at other Cub forums as well? I'm sure there are other threads all over the net that disparage your beloved.

 

It's quite clear that much of what is discussed in some of these threads is "tongue and cheek" making fun of players from a rival team, yet you try to get up on a high horse and act like some pontificating moral policeman.

 

If our place profanes you so much, why keep coming around?

 

Because I enjoy the banter. Mostly, I come here because there are several good, knowledgable posters. I've learned a thing or two. Occasionally, people start irrelevant jabbing. And I'll admit I'm a sucker...........I chime in. No, you won't find me on other boards. Take a look.

 

You ask me why I feel the need to defend myself against the rival. I guess you could ask why the rival feels the need to attack to begin with. Right?

 

What do you care if I defend? Isn't that half the fun of message boards. Again, if we all agreed, then we'd have nothing but a board full of "what he said" posts.

 

 

Oh, and I think it's "tongue IN cheek".

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
Edmonds showed himself to be a homophobe in the chat in question. Perhaps you should take up your beef with him?

 

 

He answered a smart-ass question (about himself) with a smart-ass answer. He didn't begin a thread to talk about someone else's homosexuality.

 

That's not what I'm talking about.

 

I think that's a gay question. Are you gay?

 

Wow. Absolutely absurd homophobia by Jim in that chat. Any comments? Reaction?

 

He was asked a gay question, and responded with a gay answer.

 

Wow. I thought you were a defender of homophobia but as it turns out you are just a defender of Cardinals.

 

Jim Edmonds is clearly a massive homophobe yet you give him a free pass while chastising this message board. What gives?

 

Jim Edmonds didn't start this thread. Nor did he start the other one. Nor did he ask the gay question. He responded to a gay question, with a gay answer.

 

I don't defend all Cardinals. Encarnacion is worthless. The numbers say so. Sidney Ponson has lived his life as a jerk. His history is well-documented. If there's founded criticism, then have at it. Making gay jokes isn't "founded criticism". It's nothing more than an attempt to get a reaction. Congrats.......... you've gotten one.

 

I'm not looking for a reaction, I'm just looking for consistancy from you and I'm not seeing any.

 

So why are we homophobes and Jim isn't? "A gay question deserves a Gay answer" isn't a good enough excuse. Jim should have taken the moral highroad.

Edited by Chocolate Milk
Posted
Edmonds showed himself to be a homophobe in the chat in question. Perhaps you should take up your beef with him?

 

 

He answered a smart-ass question (about himself) with a smart-ass answer. He didn't begin a thread to talk about someone else's homosexuality.

 

That's not what I'm talking about.

 

I think that's a gay question. Are you gay?

 

Wow. Absolutely absurd homophobia by Jim in that chat. Any comments? Reaction?

 

He was asked a gay question, and responded with a gay answer.

 

Wow. I thought you were a defender of homophobia but as it turns out you are just a defender of Cardinals.

 

Jim Edmonds is clearly a massive homophobe yet you give him a free pass while chastising this message board. What gives?

 

Jim Edmonds didn't start this thread. Nor did he start the other one. Nor did he ask the gay question. He responded to a gay question, with a gay answer.

 

I don't defend all Cardinals. Encarnacion is worthless. The numbers say so. Sidney Ponson has lived his life as a jerk. His history is well-documented. If there's founded criticism, then have at it. Making gay jokes isn't "founded criticism". It's nothing more than an attempt to get a reaction. Congrats.......... you've gotten one.

It's no big deal though, because gay questions and answers are more or less ho-hum in this country, right?

 

 

Pretty much. I'm not even sure why it's an issue here.

Posted

K-town (which is ironically what they should call wherever Edmonds is at any given time)

 

 

If I paid you $50 would you just GO AWAY?

 

Seriously, paypal, check, a jar of pennies, food stamps, whatever it is you like.

 

In all seriousness, will you just go away if I pay you?

Posted
K-town (which is ironically what they should call wherever Edmonds is at any given time)

 

 

If I paid you $50 would you just GO AWAY?

 

Seriously, paypal, check, a jar of pennies, food stamps, whatever it is you like.

 

In all seriousness, will you just go away if I pay you?

 

Why?

 

Do you honestly take this stuff that seriously? If you're honestly annoyed by a little opposition on a meaningless message board, then you've got bigger fish to fry than just hoping that I go away, my friend.

Posted

Edmonds' reply: "Half of our team wears a halfshirt under their jersey, including #5, #27, and #26. You should try it someday and wear it under your McDonald's uniform."

 

So everyone that doesn't wear a half undershirt works at McDonalds? I think not. Edmonds is a pompous, condesending jerk.

Posted
Edmonds' reply: "Half of our team wears a halfshirt under their jersey, including #5, #27, and #26. You should try it someday and wear it under your McDonald's uniform."

 

So everyone that doesn't wear a half undershirt works at McDonalds? I think not. Edmonds is a pompous, condesending jerk.

 

Context.

 

It was a tongue-in-cheek question, and a tongue-in-cheek answer.

 

Yeah, he's a little arrogant. So what?

Posted

Edmonds would have made a great jerk from an 80's high school movie, jocks in half shirts were always the meanies.

 

 

 

 

 

I like how it's okay for Edmonds to be a jerk in that chat because "we don't know the context of that site" and it's all about sarcasm and political incorrectness, but then we're all jerks for picking on Edmonds on this site, even though this site is all about picking on Edmonds. If he gets a free pass for being a jerk since it's part of his schtick, then we get a free pass for picking on Edmonds because it's part of our DNA.

Posted
QUIT COMING TO A CUBS MESSAGE BOARD AND COMPLAINING WHEN CUBS FANS MAKE FUN OF JIM EDMONDS

 

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the intent of the "Rivalries" forum. If I am, then please feel free to re-explain the rules and format to me.

Posted
Edmonds would have made a great jerk from an 80's high school movie, jocks in half shirts were always the meanies.

 

 

 

 

 

I like how it's okay for Edmonds to be a jerk in that chat because "we don't know the context of that site" and it's all about sarcasm and political incorrectness, but then we're all jerks for picking on Edmonds on this site, even though this site is all about picking on Edmonds. If he gets a free pass for being a jerk since it's part of his schtick, then we get a free pass for picking on Edmonds because it's part of our DNA.

 

 

Sure. I have no problem with that....... and I haven't called any of you jerks. On that forum, people took shots at Edmonds, and he took shots back. Fair enough. On this forum, some of you take shots at Edmonds, and I take shots in the opposite direction. Fair enough?

Posted
QUIT COMING TO A CUBS MESSAGE BOARD AND COMPLAINING WHEN CUBS FANS MAKE FUN OF JIM EDMONDS

 

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the intent of the "Rivalries" forum. If I am, then please feel free to re-explain the rules and format to me.

 

Rivalries doesn't mean, place where Cubs fans can't make fun of Cardinals. This is still a Cubs-centric website built and run by Cubs fans with a vast majority of Cubs fans as users.

Posted
QUIT COMING TO A CUBS MESSAGE BOARD AND COMPLAINING WHEN CUBS FANS MAKE FUN OF JIM EDMONDS

 

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the intent of the "Rivalries" forum. If I am, then please feel free to re-explain the rules and format to me.

 

It's not a place for Cardinals fans to hang out on NSBB and not expect their favorite players to be made fun of.

 

I have no desire to go to Cardstalk and find threads about Zambrano/Wood/Prior and constantly defend them. I think I would understand that those threads come with the territory, as it is a Cardinals forum.

Posted
Sure. I have no problem with that....... and I haven't called any of you jerks. On that forum, people took shots at Edmonds, and he took shots back. Fair enough. On this forum, some of you take shots at Edmonds, and I take shots in the opposite direction. Fair enough?

 

No, not fair enough. The rules of the board are pretty clear that you don't take shots at other posters. We're making fun of Edmonds, not you.

Posted
Sure. I have no problem with that....... and I haven't called any of you jerks. On that forum, people took shots at Edmonds, and he took shots back. Fair enough. On this forum, some of you take shots at Edmonds, and I take shots in the opposite direction. Fair enough?

 

No, not fair enough. The rules of the board are pretty clear that you don't take shots at other posters. We're making fun of Edmonds, not you.

 

I haven't take shots at any other posters, have I? I'm simply giving an opposing view to the Edmonds opinions.

Posted
QUIT COMING TO A CUBS MESSAGE BOARD AND COMPLAINING WHEN CUBS FANS MAKE FUN OF JIM EDMONDS

 

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the intent of the "Rivalries" forum. If I am, then please feel free to re-explain the rules and format to me.

 

Rivalries doesn't mean, place where Cubs fans can't make fun of Cardinals. This is still a Cubs-centric website built and run by Cubs fans with a vast majority of Cubs fans as users.

 

I never told you to stop making fun. I'm simply telling you why I don't agree with your opinion.

Posted
Sure. I have no problem with that....... and I haven't called any of you jerks. On that forum, people took shots at Edmonds, and he took shots back. Fair enough. On this forum, some of you take shots at Edmonds, and I take shots in the opposite direction. Fair enough?

 

No, not fair enough. The rules of the board are pretty clear that you don't take shots at other posters. We're making fun of Edmonds, not you.

 

I haven't take shots at any other posters, have I? I'm simply giving an opposing view to the Edmonds opinions.

 

No, you're complaning that the orignal Edmonds opinion was made in the first place...ON A CUBS BOARD.

Posted
Sure. I have no problem with that....... and I haven't called any of you jerks. On that forum, people took shots at Edmonds, and he took shots back. Fair enough. On this forum, some of you take shots at Edmonds, and I take shots in the opposite direction. Fair enough?

 

No, not fair enough. The rules of the board are pretty clear that you don't take shots at other posters. We're making fun of Edmonds, not you.

 

I haven't take shots at any other posters, have I? I'm simply giving an opposing view to the Edmonds opinions.

 

Calling the posters that make fun of Edmonds homophobic isn't taking shots?

Posted
Sure. I have no problem with that....... and I haven't called any of you jerks. On that forum, people took shots at Edmonds, and he took shots back. Fair enough. On this forum, some of you take shots at Edmonds, and I take shots in the opposite direction. Fair enough?

 

No, not fair enough. The rules of the board are pretty clear that you don't take shots at other posters. We're making fun of Edmonds, not you.

 

I haven't take shots at any other posters, have I? I'm simply giving an opposing view to the Edmonds opinions.

 

No, you're complaning that the orignal Edmonds opinion was made in the first place...ON A CUBS BOARD.

 

 

So? Like I said, do you want a board with no opposition? Is that the intent? Like I said, you don't want a board where a guy posts something, and everyone else says "Yeah, you're right". What's the point of that?

Posted

So? Like I said, do you want a board with no opposition? Is that the intent? Like I said, you don't want a board where a guy posts something, and everyone else says "Yeah, you're right". What's the point of that?

 

This isn't a matter of differing opinions. You are complaining about people expressing their opinion, and you do it everytime they say something bad about one of your boys. Somebody posted an article that came up on ESPN.com, and then you go off accusing people of people homophobes for it.

Posted
Sure. I have no problem with that....... and I haven't called any of you jerks. On that forum, people took shots at Edmonds, and he took shots back. Fair enough. On this forum, some of you take shots at Edmonds, and I take shots in the opposite direction. Fair enough?

 

No, not fair enough. The rules of the board are pretty clear that you don't take shots at other posters. We're making fun of Edmonds, not you.

 

I haven't take shots at any other posters, have I? I'm simply giving an opposing view to the Edmonds opinions.

 

No, you're complaning that the orignal Edmonds opinion was made in the first place...ON A CUBS BOARD.

 

 

So? Like I said, do you want a board with no opposition? Is that the intent? Like I said, you don't want a board where a guy posts something, and everyone else says "Yeah, you're right". What's the point of that?

 

I think we have plenty of dissent around here. We have good discussions. What does grow weary is a Cardinal fan who mucks up threads because we made fun of his boyfriend. It's also worse when such poster decides to accuse others of being homophobic or whatever because they made fun of his boyfriend.

 

We have other Cardinal fans here who don't feel the need to jump in these threads and act like complete douches. I lurk at Cardinal sites as well as other places. If I see someone refer to Zambrano as a "head case" I rarely will even bother to defend him. It's pointless. If I did, I certainly wouldn't do it ad naseum.

 

If there was a discussion of best pitchers of all-time, I might offer my prespective...or even on other baseball related issues, but certainly I'd know that making disparaging remarks against the Cubs would be just part of the territory.

 

Giving your opinion is ok. I'm glad we have differing views, and in fact I have what I'd call some pretty good relationships with some of the other Card fans here. But you seem to argue just for the sake of it and frankly it gets old.

Posted
Do you realize you are whining about CUBS FANS ON A CUBS FANS MESSAGE BOARD MAKING FUN OF A CARDINALS PLAYER.

 

Isn't that what the "Rivalries" section is all about?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...