i'm so tired of this utterly ridiculous argument. to the guy who said they'd take podsednik or pierre over dunn: are you out of your mind? this makes no sense whatsoever. dunn's OBP is .384, which is 19 points higher than podsednik's, and 74 points higher than pierre's. you know what? i could care less about dunn's batting average. dunn's ability to draw walks completely negates his batting average, because even if he's hitting .240 he's still getting on base more than almost anyone in the national league. 38% OF THE TIME ADAM DUNN COMES TO THE PLATE HE DOES NOT MAKE AN OUT. i don't know how much clearer i could make it. let's move on to the strikeout argument. who cares? A STRIKEOUT IS JUST ANOTHER OUT. no one is complaining about the cubs striking out this year, probably because they're in the bottom half of the NL in strikeouts. they could be in the top for all i care, it still doesn't change the fact that no one on the cubs knows how to draw walks and the cubs are close to last in the NL in OBP. of course, dunn helps solve those two problems immediately. ok ok ok, so maybe once every two weeks dunn fails to move a runner over to third base. maybe he fails to drive a guy in with a sacrifice fly. BUT ALONG WITH THESE SHORTCOMINGS HE HITS 50 HOME RUNS. right how he's slugging .550, with an OPS of .935. aramis last year had an OPS of .951. huff has never had an OPS that high. carlos beltran has never had an OPS that high. and you know what? ADAM DUNN IS ONLY 25 YEARS OLD. also, i would like to throw these numbers out to you guys: .300/.417/.611 1.028 OPS 8 HR 21 RBI 19 R 27 H those are adam dunn's stats at wrigley field (90 ABs) in the last three years. why wouldn't dunn's numbers improve after being traded to the cubs? he clearly has success at wrigley, he's getting out of a horrible situation in cincy, and he's finally playing on an (alleged) contender. this is why i will be furious if the cubs let the astros or dodgers pry him away from cincy. i said it in the other thread: right now i would trade pie for him. i don't think there's a player in the cubs' system that i wouldn't trade for dunn. he's one of the few guys you trade anything for, right up there with abreu. first of all, i think pie is slightly overrated by this board, and i think if the cubs bring him up it will be a mistake. he needs to develop more, and work on his patience and his ability to steal bases. he's got all the talent in the world, but will he ever be the player dunn is? i don't know. it's possible, but unlikely. if we could, i'd love to keep pie and let him develop and be an all-star caliber CF. but if that's the one thing the reds want, then i think we should pull the trigger. i'll trade a potential all-star for a player who has been one of the most productive players in the game the last couple of years any day of the week. i think if you can trade for a player of dunn's caliber, you do it. dunn is one of the most underrated players in the game, just because people don't understand how valuable he is to an offense. it's a fact. you can argue with me all you want about whether it's worth trading pie for him, and trust me, i can understand that argument. but don't waste your time saying that dunn isn't productive, because it's a fact that he is. look it up. i wish there was a giant book of baseball that had such facts, some kind of infallible bible type book that had such truths. argh. some people think bush is a good president, some people think the world is flat, and others think adam dunn sucks 'cause he strikes out too much and plays crappy defense. it's one of those things, i guess.