Man Indiana sure played well in the tournament. And the fifth and sixth place teams, Ohio State and Minnesota, had good showings as well. Oh wait...... Yes, Indiana was awful. But they did lose their coach right at the end of the season. Ohio State probably, or at least arguably, should've been in the tournament. Still, for a conference that is supposed to be horrendous, 5-2 with two Sweet 16 teams isn't too shabby. They still only had four teams in the tournament. Of course a conferences odds of looking good and having a good record are going to improve if they only have their best teams. If the Pac-10 only had four teams in, they'd be 6-1 with three Sweet 16 teams. Instead, Arizona and Oregon both got in, lost in the first round and dropped the overall record down. The Big 10 was down this year and was only better than the SEC. I don't see why some Big 10 homers (I'm looking at Keener, not you) continue to say the Big 10 was good this year when it clearly wasn't. For one, with as much crap as the Big Ten caught this year about them being horrible, and people have said that being the best in the Big Ten is like who has the ugliest mother, I think its fair to give them props. I have said all year that the Big Ten was down, I have never said they werent. But they didnt deserve all the crap they got, because the other leagues arent that much superior to them. Im just sick and tired of the crap that gets spewed about the Big Ten being terrible, since we had to hear about it in football also. And when push came to shove, Big Ten football didnt look to damn bad in the bowls, and the basketball teams arent looking too damn bad either.