At which point I'm already wondering if the Cubs are overpaying. This offseason has set the marginal cost of a win up to at least $5 million, maybe even more. But let's go with $5 million for now. I think a good WAG for Garza's arbitration awards/salaries the next two years is $20 million. He was a 5.0 fWAR pitcher last year, but that was a huge career year, so let's say he's worth 8 wins the next two years, so that'd put his value at $40 million and his surplus value at $20 million. Throw in another 7.5 million for the value of the draft pick compensation and the right to negotiate with him before anyone else can (that's sort of a WAG, but THBT did do a study on the value of draft picks recently, and that's in the ballpark). So in generic market terms, I'd value Garza as a $27.5 million asset right now. Hanley Ramirez is due $46.5 million over the next three seasons. He'd be in the same compensation/negotiation category as Garza, so in order to match Garza in value he'd have to be projected to exceed his compensation by $20 million over the next three years. That'd be $66.5 million, and at $5 million/win, a total of 13.3 WAR. Can we project Hanley Ramirez as a 4.4 WAR player on the Cubs over the next three years? I'm going to argue no. That's going to sound a little crazy because he's beaten that total every year except for last since 2006. But bear with me. First, I think his defense is clearly declining at SS, and he refuses to be moved off of it. WAR really hates him, and I think it's reasonable to project him at -1.0 win/season defensively at 3b. With the bat, he now needs to be a 5.4 WAR player per year. That's almost exactly what Fangraphs has him averaging the last three years for his total WAR excluding defense. So at this point, it's almost a perfect wash. Now throw in that Ramirez we'll be buying age 29, 30, and 31 seasons from Ramirez, which I would call post-prime years, especially for a guy with 7,000 middle-infield innings on his legs. Garza's almost exactly the same age, but pitchers tend to peak just a bit later, so I think there's more upside on his side. And acquiring Ramirez also diminishes the value of our most valuable asset: Starlin Castro, who would have to move off SS. It just doesn't quite make sense to me. It wouldn't be a terrible move, but I think the value's just a bit negative for the Cubs straight up.