Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Hairyducked Idiot

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    39,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Hairyducked Idiot

  1. Jackson single, proving once again that he studied the fine art of BABIP under LaHair this spring.
  2. Baez doubles to right-center on a hard line drive, was thinking triple the whole way, had to scramble to put on the brakes and get back to 2nd to avoid being thrown out.
  3. Four runs in against Concepcion, still in the first.
  4. Vitters gets caught at the warning track in dead center, about 395 feet from home plate.
  5. He's wild again. I'm wondering where all that supposed polish is. Radio guys describing plenty of off-speed stuff. Hoping he's just out of whack in his first year in the USA and will do better once he gets his feet under him.
  6. Matching game, players to BABIP Sappelt Johnson .372 .261
  7. http://i.minus.com/ibEmDN7KKtpzz.gif
  8. Then maybe I worded it badly. Or maybe it just is bad logic. But when I read tweets that make the guy sound like a marginal prospect, and then he gets paid 35% more than Soler did, my first reaction isn't "Ha ha, the Dodgers spent $42 million on a marginal prospect."
  9. If you don't see it, I can't help you see it. That's because you're reasoning makes no sense. So's your face.
  10. Really? My reading of the situation was that Puig would bring a lot closer to 20 million than 4, especially with the uncapped deadline looming. Concepcion was talked about as being a top-10 talent in an average system, and he got $6 million. I was going from that to the "not a top-10 talent" comments about Puig to assume that he would get less.
  11. If you don't see it, I can't help you see it.
  12. That's an absurd oversimplification, but sure.
  13. Someone was wrong, either the pundit comments or the Cubs. Given that the Cubs are betting $136 million and the pundits were betting the energy it took to post a blog entry (is that what they were doing in 2007?), I'll assume the Cubs were closer to right. /smartass Teams sometimes have dumb people running them. The Dodgers have a really dumb guy running them. There's a difference in orders of magnitude here. If the pundits were saying Puig was a $20 million dollar prospect and he got $42 million, then maybe the Dodgers are just idiots. The Cubs paid a $90 million player $136 million. The reports on Puig implied he wouldn't be worth a tenth of what he ended up getting. You can't reconcile that with just "well, maybe the Dodgers are dumb."
  14. Someone was wrong: either the pundit comments or the Dodgers. Given that the Dodgers are better $42 million dollars and the pundits were betting the energy it took them to send out a tweet, I'll assume the Dodgers were closer to right.
  15. Keeping in mind that technically neither Soler nor Almora are technically "in the system" right now, you could sort of defensibly put Candelario as high as No. 2.
  16. right now he's my top prospect in the system. Vitters > Jackson says a lot more about Jackson than it does about Vitters, although I'm very happy with Vitters' season.
  17. And Vitters finishes his day with an 8-pitch walk. That's it, screw it, he's a better prospect than Jackson right now.
  18. And Jackson, given his best chance to make it through a whole game without striking out, strikes out. At least it was looking?
  19. Vitters adds a triple to make it 2-for-4 with 5 TB. Jackson's coming up in the 9th for his first PA, and Vitters should get his fifth.
  20. I'm not going to condescend, just respectfully disagree. I think the facts fit the "he's getting tired" argument better than they fit the "batters hit his fastball better after seeing it multiple times."
  21. Coming into today, K/BB ratio: Pitches 1-25: 6.25 26-75: 3.00 76+: 1.67 I've never really bought into the idea that you need a ton of different pitches to be an effective starter. It looks to me that he just doesn't have the stamina to be a starter right now, either in terms of a single game or the course of a season. I don't know if he's going to get better in future seasons, but there's no reason not to try. You can always shift him back to the bullpen later.
  22. And only 1 K in 17 batters faced. 3.75 FIP or better in 7 of his last 11 12 starts.
  23. Saves the trouble of nontendering him later.
  24. what the hell has been interesting? I dunno. I feel the same way as UMF, but I just can't put my finger on it. I've watched more Cubs baseball this year than the past three years combined, and this team is worse than any of them.
×
×
  • Create New...