Odd, I seem to recall the 2003 Braves winning two games in that series and generally not getting blown away 20-6. Even from people who (probably correctly) attribute what's happened to the Cubs in the playoffs as fluke statistical variation, it's baffling that they keep trying to equivocate over the sheer improbability of what has happened to the Cubs. The odds of equal matchups (and I'd call the last 9 Cubs playoff games equal matchups) producing 9 straight losses is 512-1. The odds of none of those losses being by one run is even more staggering. The odds of the Cubs losing the 2003 NLCS at their high point were 44.45:1. Even ignoring the first 4/5ths of the streak, the Cubs are at the extreme ends of the spectrum of statistical likelihood.