I don't see anything controversial about what Sandberg did, and the media likely didn't either. What's interesting is not only is it not being written about now, it wasn't written about then. Why? Because it's inconsequential. I followed Sandberg as closely as any player. I remember being extremely dissapointed that he retired. When I began to learn why, I supported him in that decision. It was the right decision then and it's the right decision now. I also don't recall there being any debate at the time of whether he was wrong in what he was doing. I think the media, his team mates, and fans realized then just as they do now that he was making the right call. His family, his children, were and should have been more important. The fact is your situation was likely very different from Sandberg's in the fact that to financially provide for yourself and your family, you had to keep working. Sandberg had been making 7 million a year for 3 years at the time of his retirement. He was capable of quitting. In fact, he was leaving a lot of money on the table when he walked away. Also, I'm only assuming this, but I doubt your professional life required you to be away as much as Sandberg's did. It's really hard to be there for your children or to try to reconcile with a spouse when you have to go on the road as often or when you are constantly in the public eye. Surely he was lucky that he was in a financial position to walk away to be there for his family. If I were in the same boat, I likely wouldn't have that luxury, but you can bet I'd do the same if I could. I have played sports and yes, I can understand how some would feel upset at a team mate bailing on them. But what Sandberg did was different than a player saying I'm tired so I quit or I want to quit so I can travel the world and smoke pot, ala Ricky Williams. When one looks at why Sandberg made his choice, no sane person can argue with those priorities. Your last statement I think is completely wrong. The reasons do matter. No sport, no season, and no game is more important than family. There are reasons that make it acceptable to walk away from playing a game. That's what this is. Regardless of how much we invest in it. Regardless of how much time we spend watching, playing, or discussing it. It is a game. It's not more important than the well being of someone's family. I think Sandberg's team mates recognized that. I think the media recognized that. I think the fans recognized that. The fact that you don't makes me really question how you think putting a game above the needs of family is acceptable in the least.