time for another post by jjgman that gets mistaken for supporting Hendry, when it is really just an attack on a bs argument used to support someone else's position. on the bolded part above. nonesense. neither the Cardinals or Astros had big injury problems in 2003. the grand sum of their impact injuries were Cardinals - Vina replaced by the two month wonder, Bo Hart. Drew replaced by Eduardo Perez's 122 OPS+, Morris missing about 6 starts. Astros - Kent missed about 25 games, Oswalt missed about 12 starts. certainly not coming close to approaching the injury problems the Cubs went through in 2004-2005. if you want to excuse the Cardinals and Astros performance in 2003 due to injuries, you should bow down to Baker and Hendry for the Cubs doing what they did in 2004-2005. Okay. I should have made my point differently. We made it to the playoffs by winning 89 games in 2003. If we were in the NL East or NL West we wouldn't have made the playoffs. We won the Central division on a down year. I'll give you most of 2004, but down the stretch the team was healthy and choked. We won 79 games last year. Injuries or not, that's pathetic for a team with one of the highest payrolls in baseball.