Put me in the "what a waste" response category if this turns out. The closer position exists because of the save stat, not the other way around, which makes it a pretty [expletive] position to have in the first place. If there's a 1-run lead against the Mets with the heart of their order coming up, Marmol is an excellent choice for closer. If it's a 3-run game against Cincy and Hairston, Macias, and Perez are up at the bottom of the order, using your filthiest reliever just because he's supposed to be the one who gets that tick mark in the save category when every other person in the bullpen could get the job done in that situation is a complete waste at best. Considering the fact that we're going to have ample games this year where Marquis and Dempster are going to be pulled in the fifth inning with bases juiced and none out in close games, I cringe at the idea of not bringing in Marmol with the justification that it's not the role he's been type-cast for this season. If the closer position MUST exist, I'm perfectly ok with it being the second or third best reliever on the staff. Not Marmol.