I don't think that you can call Hill "Overhyped". Honestly, besides O_O, Raisin, Serena, Raw, DJaxx, Tinkers & Brian and the rest of the minor league game thread bunch know about Hill Before this season? For pete's sake, He pitched in high A ball last season. This is an example of rushing a prospect with a hot hand. Hill has the stuff, he just needs to master it. He mastered his stuf in the minors this year, given time he might be able to harness in MLB. But to the point of this thread, if we overvalued him by NOT trading him at the deadline then who would we have traded him for? Who would we have replaced him with? If anything, it probably would have been smarter to trade Rusch who would have had more value because the majority of "contenders" who want to add a player at the deadline are looking for "impact" veterans. Not many in the playoff race would want to add a 25 year old starter with (at the time) 1 start under their belt. If we traded him for our benefit of an impact player then who would you have gotten? Who was out there and available for Hill? Seeing as how we landed the highest impact player that was traded at the deadline, i wouldn't complain too hard. Now if I were an Angel fan and seeing the A's coming hard and seeing my 4th & 5th starters being rookies, then I would be mildy upset.