Stratos
-
Posts
3,896 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Stratos
-
For 1B bench its possible they try to get one or more of the current bench infielders some time at 1B in ST to fill in in a pinch, they're all good fielders. They can all bat RH. Tucker also has 100 innings of 1B experience from 2019, and as you say Amaya has a bit of time there and is also RHB. There's been no heat around them signing an 1B and its hard to see them signing one over a 3B. If Busch is injured they have Jonathon Long and Ballesteros too, which made Mervis expendable.
-
Agree would be nice to keep Workman. He does have power too. If there's an injury at 1B or OF there's a good chance one of the better prospects are called up to start instead of using these lower tier bench guys. So we do have bench power in a sense but just in Iowa. Cubs seem to be leaning towards fielding and speed for the bench guys so far, which might make sense since it's less volatile and easier to maintain with limited playing time. But I still could see them signing a bench INF power bat. Would give them another option at DH also. I think it's hard to sign good though if they can't guarantee playing time.
-
After Berti the Cubs have room for 1 more bench infielder. But I don't think Brujan has options and Workman has to stay on the 26-man. Brujan can also play OF including CF as well so they could carry him as a super utility to cover OF if they want and still add a bench corner INF. I assume the Cubs carry 4 bench players plus Suzuki.
-
Berti replaces Mastrobuoni's role and seems like what they always wanted Mastro to be. Decent depth signing especially with Nico/Swanson coming off injury. Just turned 35 but he still had 90th percentile running speed in 2024. Has neutral splits.
-
If we're in the playoffs that makes us World Series contenders by default. We were a 83 win team last year. The Tucker/Bellinger moves can nab us about another 4 wins on paper if the Cubs spend the savings.
-
I ignore all commentary from BN since its total cringe, I just use them as a good summary for Cubs news.
-
They revealed Nico hasn't started throwing or hitting yet post- surgery. But that doesn't mean anything i guess.
-
Did we hear anything about the Nico's surgery recovery this weekend? All I heard was that it bothered his throwing the most last season.
-
Tom said in an interview 2 days ago with Kap that he thinks fans shouldn't call him cheap because he invested a billion dollars into the neighbourhood. I'm not kidding. Both interviewers kissed Tom's rump and backed up his excuses the whole interview. Time-stamped to the question:
-
delete
-
Robertson has been about as consistently good as a reliever could be. They'd just be rolling the dice on age decline, but he's showed no signs of it, in fact his velo has been at career highs. They likely get a 1-yr deal that makes up for the age risk.
-
Well 3.83 FIP, and 4.29 xFIP is average territory for a reliever. He's not a soft-contact guy or a groundball guy so I just don't get it I guess. I don't think the Phillies added him to close did they? His FIP the last 2 season (outside Colorado) is around 3.60, the xFIP being around 4.35 (not doing the math either lol). I just don't see a dominant pitcher, I see someone they can work with to potentially create one, which IMO isn't what you want for a closer because it just might not happen. On the other hand, it would be a signing with upside rather than one with downside risk like the older guys Yates etc
-
Estevez last year had career lows in BABIP, K/9, BB/9, HR/9, and HR/FB. His ERA was over a run and a half lower than his xFIP. He has every red flag of significant regression next year. He projects to a 4.00 ERA on FG. He seems like an average to maybe above average reliever. Not really sure why he's even considered a closer other than having some saves on some bad teams. I can see the Cubs seeing some upside here and he can bolster a pen but he's not a guy you'd sign as your closer if your goal is to win the division and make a deep playoff run. Needing to trade a good prospect at the deadline for 2 months of a legit closer if the Cubs are contending is a stupid position to put yourself in, stop trying to be cute and go get one now. I feel similar with Finnegan. I'm fine with either if they sign one plus a legit closer like Robertson/Yates.
-
This signing is a joke. Beyond the Cubs this just isn't good for the mid and small market teams to compete. Dodgers won the WS and will be adding Ohtani, Snell, Sasaki, and Scott to their pitching staff.
-
He was rocking a small pot belly last year wasn't he? Agree wouldn't hurt if he came into camp in better shape this year.
-
If the Cubs are 3rd in revenue (not including the neighborhood investments) and Tom chooses to only spend where the Cubs only rank 9th or 10th in LT payroll then he has 2 choices in interviews: tell the truth or lie and make excuses. Since telling the truth would be bad for PR, he chooses to lie and make excuses. Since lying and making excuses is also bad for PR then you're right, he needs to stop doing interviews because there's nothing he can say that can justify his actions to fans. If he actually just straight up told the truth at least i could respect him for being honest and transparent with his customers. But the owner saying "my main priority is maximizing my profit, which means being just good enough to keep hope alive to fill seats" is going to lose them some customers.
-
Some notes from this article about a recent Jesse Rogers interview: https://www.bleachernation.com/cubs/2025/01/17/cubs-free-agent-plans/ - "Rogers feels very confident that the Cubs will sign (more likely) or trade for (less likely) an established back-end reliever before Opening Day. “(I) truly believe they will sign a back-end closer. I guess there’s a chance at a trade. But one way or another, this team will have one of the back-end relievers on the market.” ...Rogers continued on to say that “The Cubs have basically checked in on all of (the free agent relievers, including Tanner Scott).” And that he thinks “they’re saving whatever dollars they have left for a back-end guy, a closer.” - Says they're likely to add another bat, likely an FA 3B. 3B market has been a little slow because of Bregman. - Speculation but: "...the Cubs are likely slow-playing both of these pursuits (closer and third base). According to Rogers, if the market craters for certain guys and one-year deals really do make it to the table, the Cubs will have the flexibility to go there: “A month from now, if Jack Flaherty, Pete Alonso, and Alex Bregman haven’t signed, all bets are off. And that’s why I think the Cubs are probably waiting it out a bit. The Cubs are flexible enough to give them $25 or $30M for a one-year deal.”
-
-
Believe it when I see it.
-
Post cool links or just chat about the convention here.
-
The other 29 owners are coming to kick the Dodgers' arse in the next CBA
-
Anybody want to become a Dodgers fan with me? Sounds fun
-
When prices go up winners reduce payroll.
-
Leaving 1-2 WAR on the table for a borderline playoff team is pretty dumb. Unless as an owner/ business your goal is only to fill seats in the regular season.
-
Maybe the Japanese players love playing in domes with turf. Reminds them of home.
